My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 01-28-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 01-28-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:02 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:02:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />JANUARY 14,2002 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />would have to participate financially_ He added they did not kuow what that dollar amount would <br />be. He stated staffkuows that amount staff would have to bring it back for approval to the City <br />Council. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem asked for some assurance on what the City was committing. Mr. Parrish <br />responded the financial considerations have been made in a broad statement to increase the <br />comfort leve1. He read the statement. He stated if the City was not comfortable later with the <br />amount required for design build, it could back off the project. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated one reason to avoid a dollar amount at this point was that it created a target <br />to come back to. He noted the intention of the letter is to say they would contribute financially. <br />He added they do not have a choice. He stated if they take out the commitment, the City would <br />not be a player. He noted he was comfortable with submitting a letter and then seeing how the <br />negotiations would play out. He added since the City has a place at the table, it would be able to <br />somewhat control that. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated her concern about what they would be spending as the process goes <br />on and other players become involved. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated the fundamental purpose of the letter was not to encumber the City <br />financially. He noted it is broad enough to allow the City room to negotiate. He added it is <br />specific enough to let the County kuow not to allow the consultant to take off in a certain way <br />without considering the City's issues. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated the City needs to be involved with the design process. She <br />noted if the City builds its own facility, it would put money into the design process. <br /> <br />Councihnember Rem stated she agreed that they would have more control if they were part of the <br />planning process. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked if the City Council wished to approve the proposed letter and directed it be <br />submitted under the Mayor's and the City Administrator's signature. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated the Councilmember names should be copied so the County <br />kuows they are all on board. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated that as Councilmembers they might view this as their participation <br />in the project. He noted they could also view it as input into a facility that will be here within the <br />City. He added they also want it to work well since it is on a major highway in the area. He stated <br />that it is not just the City's facility they are concerned about. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst concurred. <br /> <br />e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.