My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 02-25-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 02-25-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:06 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:03:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COlINCIL WORKSESSION MINUTES <br />JANUARY 22,2002 <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson suggested Guidant go to the surrounding neighborhood and ask <br />opinions regarding their plans which would include aestethics and traffic control. Parrish <br />indicated the City could help Guidant with this resident meeting by identifying those <br />residents surrounding the Guidant campus. Councilmember Rem noted she had received <br />a cal1 from a resident to thc north of the Guidant campus who is concerned about the <br />parking ramps and Cummings Park. Rem suggested it may be helpful to show existing <br />Guidant campus boundaries in relation to the park. Probst indicated an issue we should <br />deal with is the access road to the park and the water tower. Parrish indicated a possible <br />solution could be to create an access off ofWyncrest which also creates some <br />neighborhood issues. Guidant indicated curb cuts would be reduced. Parrish said the fire <br />department has been given an opportunity to provide input on the Guidant plans and they <br />did not have an issue with the height of any proposed buildings but their issues would be <br />with access to the different buildings. Parrish said at this point Guidant wil1 take <br />comments and develop a master plan which he anticipates will be a year long approval <br />process. Parrish indicated the 2002 planned buildings may proceed without a finalized <br />master PUD plan. Guidant indicated the 2002 new building construction may need a <br />variance from setbacks along Fernwood but otherwise should not violate any city codes. <br /> <br />I-35W Corridor Coalition Transportation and Redevelopment Priorities -Lynch <br />recapped the items the Planner had identified as priorities and asked if the Council was in <br />agreement with these priorities. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked if the City will be able to participate in the decision making <br />process for the 96/1 0 corridor. Parrish said the decision-making process would involve <br />soliciting our comments. <br /> <br />Council was in agreement on the priorities for the Coalition and agreed to put this item on <br />the next Consent Calendar. <br /> <br />I-35W Corridor Coalition GIS Coordinator - A separate GIS coordinator has been <br />hired by the Coalition and the City has been approached about providing an office for this <br />individual in our City Hal1 with the understanding the Coalition would provide the <br />technology working with our netwofk server. Probst said he believes we could benefit <br />from providing an office for this person in our City Hall. Parrish said having this person <br />at City Hal1 also allows us to have access to the equipment that comes along with a GIS <br />function such as a projector, printer, etc. Lynch indicated we most likely would receive a <br />reduction in our portion ofthe cost for this individual if we provide an office for this <br />person on-site. Council agreed to place this item on the Consent Calendar. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Arden Tower Update - Scherbel noted he had solicited a cost proposal for another <br />evaluation of the tower and previous engineering report prepared on the tower. Larson <br />said he believes the City should not be picking up the cost ofthis second evaluation. <br />Scherbel said according to the building code he can require an evaluation ifhe believes <br />something is unsafe but it would be up Vaughn to choose the company and cost. . <br />Scherbel said a qualified engineer should evaluate the report and prepare an independent <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.