Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />FEBRUARY 11, 2002 <br /> <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />"v.~~ <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated that if it is a local street the underground cost is picked up by the <br />local community. He asked a what point does Xcel not assess the cost back as it progresses to <br />the high lines. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Filla stated a city's request for an underground line triggers the discussion on how to pay for <br />it. He noted the city would just pay the incremental cost of putting the line underground. He <br />added if other issues make underground the only option for Xcel the cost becomes part of the rate <br />structure, <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked if there were situations with distribution lines that go underground and no <br />one pays an additional charge. Mr. Wertish responded yes and no, He stated Xcel's practice in <br />new residential areas is to put the lines underground. He noted there is a lot revenue generated <br />by Wispark to offset the charges, He added the developer wants to develop 100 lots so he has to <br />pay for it. He stated everyiliing is cost justified. <br /> <br />COllilcilmember Aplikowski asked why Wispark is not picking up the extra cost for these lines <br />since it need them. Mr. Wertish responded Arden Hills has requested the line to be undergrollild. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated the Wispark development triggered the need for this line. She <br />asked if this line would benefit any new development in Arden Hills. Mr. Wertish responded <br />that for additional development they would need additional feeders from Substation 10. He <br />stated this line benefits Arden Hill because the system is tied together, e <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch stated currently underground line YWllling in Hamlin Avenue in the TCAAP property. <br />He noted Mr. Wertish had claimed earlier Xcel would have to replace that line in the next five <br />years. He asked who would pay for that cost. Mr. Wertish responded general rate payers <br />everywhere would pick that cost up. He stated if they have to upgrade or reconstruct a line, that <br />is a cost of doing business. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch asked for clarification. Mr. Wertish responded it costs more to go underground. He <br />stated they are obligated by the commission and the ratepayers to use the most cost efficient way <br />to construct a line. He noted south of Highway 96 they have no options. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch asked whether it would be possible to upgrade the line through Hamline Avenue to <br />meet these needs. Mr. Wertish responded no. He stated they needed another circuit. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated one conceivable option would have been to move up replacement <br />of that line rather than build this line. Mr. Wertish responded the incremental increase is not <br />enough. He stated they needed another circuit. He noted that with an upgrade of the Hamline <br />A venue line the incremental gain is minimal. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated a double circuit could have been placed on metal poles, He noted <br />it would not have cost more than what Xcel is doing. Mr. Wertish respondcd operations did not . <br />want to put both lines on the same pole. <br />