Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-. <br /> <br />-. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Memo to Plmming Commission <br />Planning Case #02-02 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />II Topography: <br /> <br />LRelatively Flat <br /> <br />~I <br /> <br />Variance Criteria <br /> <br />The applicant is seeking to replace and slightly expand the existing deck on their property. <br />The existing deck is currently 35 feet from the property line. In short, the applicant has <br />indicated that the variance is necessary for the following reasons: <br /> <br />. The improvement will represent and enhancement to the neighborhood through <br />good architectural design. <br />. The deck is approximately 40 years old and should be repaired or safety reasons. <br /> <br />A. State Requirements <br /> <br />Minnesota State Statue in Chapter 462.357, Subdivision 6, (2), defines "undue <br />hardship" as: <br /> <br />"... means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the <br />property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted. will not alter the essential <br />character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if <br />reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of the ordinance...." <br /> <br />B. City Requirements <br /> <br />Section VIII, 0, 4, c and d, of the City's Zoning Ordinance state that, <br /> <br />"Adherence to the provisions of this ordinance is required, except for special cases which arise <br />because of the configuration of a particular parcel. The condition shall not have been created by <br />the landowner. A variance or variances of a side of a lot, the shape of the lot or the unusual <br />terrain prohibit reasonable development equivalent to that which would be permitted without <br />variance on a similar size lot located in the same district, but which lot has no unusual <br />configuration. Economic conditions alone shall not be grounds for a variance. In no case shall <br />the granting of a variance impair the health, safety, comfort and general welfare of the public, nor <br />will it be contrary to the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan, the official map or this or <br />any other ordinance of the City". <br /> <br />Variance FindinQs <br /> <br />In orderto grant a variance, the following criteria must be addressed as defined by the City <br />and the State. For this application for a variance, staff can make the following findings: <br /> <br />1. Whether the circumstances for which the variance is requested are unique to the <br />property. <br />