My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 04-29-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 04-29-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:10 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:03:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
258
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />". <br /> <br />Memo to Planning Commission <br />Planning Case #02-05: Guidant Site Plan Review / Variance Request <br />March 28, 2002 <br />Page 4 of 11 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> Percentage of Trees of Various Caliper Inches <br /> 2.0" B 3.0" 3.5"B 4.0" 4.5"B5.0" <br />Builllin. Rei.hl Required Proposed Require<! Proposell Require<! Pruposell <br />Three to Four Stories 50% 44%* 30% 0% 20% 0% <br /># of Caliper Inches 173.5 153 104 0 69 0 <br /> * Of total calipfTinches required <br /> <br />Given the significant site amenities, courtyards, foundation plantings, and related landscaping <br />incOIporated in the site plan, staff would suggest the following condition to resolve the <br />deficiencies in the applicant's landscape plan: <br /> <br />. The applicant submit a revised landscape plan to include 250 caliper inches oflandscaping as <br />approved by staff. The percentage of caliper inches shall be consistent with the percentages <br />outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. <br /> <br />4. Height (Code Requirement Not Met) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The maximum building height allowed in the Limited Industrial District is 35 feet. The proposed <br />elevations show a maximum building height of 52 feet at the highest point. For reference, the <br />height of building varies due to a significant grade change from the eastern to the western portion <br />of the building area. In addition, the height of the proposed expansion is consistent with the <br />height of the existing Building F. The applicant has submitted a variance request with regard to <br />this issue. <br /> <br />5. Parking (Meets Code Requirements) <br /> <br />It is not anticipated that any new parking will be created in conjunction with this proposal. <br />Based on discussions with Guidant and visual inspection of the property during peak times, <br />sufficient parking is in place to accommodate the existing and anticipated demand. The picture <br />taken Thursday March 28, 2002 at 10:30 am is illustrative: <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.