Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />FEBRUARY II, 2002 <br /> <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated she could see the value oflegislative action. She noted she is <br />apprehensive about the decision of a development partnership <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked for clarification on the acreage. Mayor Probst stated the Vento <br />plan had 1100 acres for parks and open spaces and 800 to 1000 acres for development. He noted <br />the National Guard's current proposal would only leave 500 acres outside of its control. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked if the City is giving up too much by agreeing to the land the <br />National Guard has left. He questioned whether they should use the figure suggested by the <br />Vento Plan. He stated it appeared the city is ceding that land to the National Guard. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that from the discussions and correspondences he felt any change would <br />unravel what they are trying to accomplish. He noted they could continue to work with the <br />National Guard to seek other parts of the property to seek other parts we think are important. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated the language has a range from 500 to 800 acres. He noted he <br />would prefer to see just the higher figure. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated they could easily remove the number and just indicate the remaining land, <br />He noted Representative McCullum wanted almost a legal description, <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson agreed to deleting the number. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated they should phrase it as much as possible to work with the National <br />Guard, She noted the National Guard is key to the City obtaining approval. She added that <br />perhaps they should mention the DNR, <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant asked if the school district should be added as a part, Mayor Probst <br />responded he was not sure ofthe school district's interest. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated he is prepared to support the two resolutions. He noted the <br />Council has made a number of changes. He asked whether the Council could vote on them with <br />the understanding someone would fax the Councilmembers the revised Resolution. He stated <br />then the Councilmembers could indicate their approval and fax a copy back to staff. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch stated he would prefer to use email. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson concurred, <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a <br />motion to approve Resolutions for Support For The Reuse of TCAAP Property <br />and Support For TCAAP Reuse and Acquisition, subject to changes by staff in <br />light of the discussion, and provided staff transmit revised resolutions for <br />approval by Councilmembers prior to distribution. The motion carried <br />unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />. <br />