Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />FEBRUARY 25, 2002 <br /> <br />~'~">R !', F" "t" <br />ft^li",,''''f <br />~'.,*-.i'''''''~ 10 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that as long as the change was revenue neutral he had no real opinion on the <br />matter. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst explained he would give a further update on the TCAAP issues. He stated he did <br />have a call from Ms, Link, He noted he did not have an opportunity to return that call. He <br />added one other party remains very interested. He added he had indicated that the City is still on <br />track to make a decision by the end of March. He stated he did not know if others had been <br />contacted or have an interest beyond these folks, <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that concerning the TCAAP meeting this evening he would have to confess <br />to being a bit discouraged with the conversation. He noted it was not nearly as positive as the <br />previous meeting. He added he did not know if it was because something was in writing. He <br />stated it is clear the City would have strong support from the surrounding communities. He <br />noted it is not clear, where the environmental groups would be on this issue, He added it is clear <br />they have more work to do there, <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated it seemed clear to her that one person speaking on behalf on the <br />environmental group wanted to see specific acreage and designations on this land for public use. <br />She noted the resolution seemed too vague to them as drafted. She added that it could be it was <br />the first time that they saw something in writing. She stated people wanted more specifics. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated the representative from Representative McCollum's office wanted <br />more specifics. He noted the resolution was not intended to be legislation, but just a show of <br />support from the surrounding communities, He added that once it is complete they could move <br />forward on legislation. He stated that is not clear to all the parties. He noted that over the next <br />few weeks he thinks that all the units that review it would approve it. He added the <br />environmentalist wanted to save open space, He stated the advocate was present and wanted to <br />attach a certain number of acres to a specific use. He noted that to get down to that level of detail <br />would bog down the process. He added some felt that way while others wanted more details. He <br />stated more discussions are warranted. He stated it is important that a member of the City <br />Council appear at each meeting. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated he came away somewhat frustrated, He noted that when they go into the <br />right level of detail there are already accusations, He added some feel that the Mill's plan is the <br />City's plan. He stated the City had no involvement in the Mill's plan, He noted he does not <br />know how to get around that viewpoint. He added there are concerns about preserving features <br />and open space. He stated there is some clear work to do. He noted he is at a loss on how to <br />solve some of these issues. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated the Vento plan was among the packet materials. He noted it had a <br />map accompanying it showing as far as it could what was intended. He added they could include <br />the number of acres in the resolution. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated those were included in an attachment. <br />