My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 04-29-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 04-29-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:10 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:03:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
258
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION MINUTES <br />MARCH 18, 2002 <br /> <br />r~ <br />lj <br /> <br /> <br />',->l"-'1t..(,.- <br />L; :.; <br />... iI <br />;;0 (i. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated it seems the majority of the Council supports the Ccntex team. He asked the <br />Council Members what their thoughts were regarding engaging in an independent process of <br />planning; discussing issues with a consultant, perhaps exploring several different options for <br />development <br /> <br />Council Member Aplikowski suggested including the Planning Commission and other groups in the <br />process. <br /> <br />Council Member Larson said it seems to be a good thing to have the consortium hear the input <br />from the public which also gives the City Council more information about the partner. <br /> <br />Council Member Grant asked if tbe consensus was Centex/OPUS. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst said yes. <br /> <br />Council Member Rem expressed her discomfort concerning the time-table of the project, <br /> <br />Mayor Probst said he was not prepared to be specific about a time-table at this time, stating the <br />entire process has suffered a bit because of the concern of the public, and encourages engaging the <br />Design Center for American Urban Landscape Center staff as a third party resource, He noted the <br />expense for this would be fronted by the partner, <br /> <br />Council Member Grant suggested the City stay uphold the vision of the Vento Plan. <br /> <br />Planner Parrish said staff would need direction from the Council of a firm regarding the nature of <br />the agreement between the City and the developer. The City would need to retain a development <br />attorney, and staff would begin to negotiate a preliminary development agreement, with the City <br />maintaining control over the process. <br /> <br />Council Member Larson suggested if the City were going to approach residents for input, the City <br />also should have a vision, explaining that the perfect time to go out and get input from the public is <br />before an agreement is executed, <br /> <br />Council Member Grant stated if the City went to the public for comments, we would want the <br />framework of the Vento plan as a starting point, <br /> <br />Council Aplikowski asked if the Town Hall meeting [April 20] would offer an opportunity for these <br />comments. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated he would cover this in his State of the City Address, <br /> <br />Administrator Lynch stated he envisions a ninety day window of opportunity with the developer, <br />and in that, would find out the decision on the Army National Guard property request He stated <br />further that if they [Army] are ready, a decision to activate the land transfer could begin initiating a <br />first round of public meetings occurring in May, 2002, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.