My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 04-29-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 04-29-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:10 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:03:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
258
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEl\' HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />FEBRUARY 11, 2002 <br /> <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated that if it is a local street the underground cost is picked up by the <br />local community, He asked a what point does Xce\ not assess the cost back as it progresses to <br />the high lines. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Filla stated a city's request for an underground line triggers the discussion on how to pay for <br />it. He noted the city would just pay the incremental cost of putting the line underground. He <br />added if other issues make underground the only option for Xce\ the cost becomes part of the rate <br />structure. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked ifthere were situations with distribution lines that go underground and no <br />one pays an additional charge. Mr. Wertish responded yes and no. He stated Xcel's practice in <br />new residential areas is to put the lines underground. He noted there is a lot revenue generated <br />by Wispark to offset the charges. He added the developer wants to develop 100 lots so he has to <br />pay for it. He stated everything is cost justified. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski asked why Wispark is not picking up the extra cost for these lines <br />since it need them, Mr. Wertish responded Arden Hills has requested the line to be underground. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated the Wispark development triggered the need for this line. She <br />asked if this line would benefit any new development in Arden Hills. Mr. Wertish responded <br />that for additional development they would need additional feeders from Substation 10. He _ <br />stated this line benefits Arden Hill because the system is tied together. . <br /> <br />Mr, Lynch stated currently underground line running in Hamlin Avenue in the TCAAP property. <br />He noted Mr. Wertish had claimed earlier Xcel would have to replace that line in the next five <br />years. He asked who would pay for that cost. Mr. Wertish responded general rate payers <br />everywhere would pick that cost up, He stated if they have to upgrade or reconstruct a line, that <br />is a cost of doing business. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch asked for clarification. Mr. Wertish responded it costs more to go underground. He <br />stated they are obligated by the commission and the ratepayers to use the most cost efficient way <br />to construct a line. He noted south of Highway 96 they have no options, <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch asked whether it would be possible to upgrade the line through Hamline Avenue to <br />meet these needs. Mr. Wertish responded no. He stated they needed another circuit. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated one conceivable option would have been to move up replacement <br />of that line rather than build this line, Mr. Wertish responded the incremental increase is not <br />enough, He stated they needed another circuit, He noted that with an upgrade of the Hamline <br />A venue line the incremental gain is minimal. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated a double circuit could have been placed on metal poles. He noted <br />it would not have cost more than what Xce\ is doing, Mr. Wertish responded operations did not . <br />want to put both lines on the same pole. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.