Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MA Y 1,2002 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Commissioner Duchenes stated it seemed to her that there would need to be a reciprocal <br />easement. Shc indicated the survey showed the existing drive going into the next lot. <br />She asked if there would be an easement that would benefit the lot to the south, or would <br />there be an access to Hamline A venue in the future. Mr. Parrish replied that was an <br />existing condition, and currently applicant used that for overflow parking for the nursery <br />business. He stated the nursery sales and Christmas tree sales would not be allowed if <br />this was approved. <br /> <br />Commissioner Duchenes asked what would it take for this to be considered an alley. Mr. <br />Parrish replied that the City did not allow for alleys at this time. <br /> <br />Chair Sand expressed concern that without a drainage plan it could not be known how <br />this proposal would affect the neighbors. He requested if the drainage, utility, grading <br />plans showed this would affect the neighbors, this not be approved. <br /> <br />Commissioner Galatowitsch stated she could not find any special conditions that would <br />deprive applicant the use of the land. She stated there was a home on the lot in a <br />residential district. She indicated granting a variance could be detrimental to the <br />surrounding property owners, and she did not believe this would be a good precedence to <br />set in this area. She stated she was not in favor ofthis request. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Commissioner Galatowitsch moved, seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman, to deny <br />Case #02-07, 4350 Hamline Avenue North, Thomas & Kathleen Goserud Preliminary <br />Plat Review, for the reasons there are no special conditions that would deprive applicant <br />of the use of the land; the variance could be detrimental to the surrounding property <br />owners; and this was not a good precedence to set in this area. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (7-0). <br /> <br />CASE #02-08 - PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW, GUIDANT CORPORATION, 4100 <br />HAMLINE A VENUE NORTH - PUBLIC HEARING <br /> <br />Staff reviewed their report April 25, 2002 and recommended approval of the preliminary <br />plat for the reasons contained therein. <br /> <br />Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 8:05 p.m. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman stated he believed they were putting the cart before the horse. <br />He noted the Planning Commission could not act on the request of the vacation of <br />Fermwood before the City Council had made a decision on the plat. Mr. Parrish replied <br />the City Attorney indicated if the plat did receive preliminary approval, the actual <br />vacation of property and easements eould be considered concurrent with the final platting <br />of the property. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Chair Sand stated he agreed with Commissioner Zimmerman. He stated he was reluctant <br />to go forward with this tonight without the traffic study. He stated he wanted to know <br />what the traffic impact would have at Cummings Park Drive for both Arden Hills, as well <br />as the surrounding communities. He stated he would be in favor of tabling this for more <br />information about the traffic study. <br />