My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-10-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 06-10-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:14 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:04:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />MAY 28, 2002 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />a, March 13,2002 City Council Meeting <br /> <br />Council Member Rem arrived at 7:06 p.m. <br /> <br />Council Member Rem requested the following changes: Page 10, first sentence, <br />delete the following: "Board was going to have a" and add the following "is <br />involved in a summer bike ride. . ." <br /> <br />Council Member Grant requested the following changes: page 6, paragraph above <br />the Motion delete the word "doing". Page 7, first paragraph to read: "Council <br />Member Grant asked staffs thoughts on whv the remaining 29 comer guards were <br />being recommended for installation in 2003", Page 9, 3rd paragraph to read: <br />"Council Member Grant requested clarification from the City Administrator <br />regarding a letter received from Rehbein". <br /> <br />Council Member Larson requested the following changes: Page 9, paragraph 7, to <br />read: "Council Member Larson stated he believed the Council made two decisions <br />that were not good decisions at the last Council meeting, one being the reduced <br />park dedication fee, the other was the Pavement Management Program Plan. He <br />indicated he could not find any good justification for what the Council did with <br />respect to this fee. He believed the Council made the wrong decision regarding <br />this. He indicated the second decision was the widening of the street.L-the street <br />reconstruction project, and the decision to proceed with a more costly street <br />width." <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MOTION: Council Member Aplikowski moved and Council Member Rem <br />seconded a motion to approve the May 13, 2002 regular City Council <br />Meeting as amended. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />CONSENT CALENDAR <br /> <br />A. <br />B. <br />C. <br /> <br />Claims and Payroll. <br />I -694 Aesthetic Design Plan - Authorizing Letter of Concurrence <br />Resolution No. 02-24 Reapportionment of Special Assessment No. 6578 <br />Related to Division No. DA067744 <br />2002 Personnel Policy <br />Council Chambers Signage <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />D. <br />E. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.