My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-24-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 06-24-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:16 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:04:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />\" <br /> <br />Memo to Planning Commission <br />Planning Casc #02-11 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Variance Criteria <br /> <br />The applicant is seeking to construct a 16' X 18' addition within the rear yard. This addition <br />would match up with an existing addition which is also 22' from the rear property line. See <br />the attached site layout for additional information. For reference, this addition would fit on <br />the east side yard of the property. The R-2 Zoning District allows for a 5' side yard setback <br />for principle structures. There is currently 3B' of side yard available. However, the <br />applicant has indicated that they currently have two egress windows that serve two <br />bedrooms in the basement. As such, they cannot put the addition on this side of the house <br />without expanding the basement as well. See the attached letter from the applicant <br />outlining the need for a variance. <br /> <br />A. State Requirements <br /> <br />Minnesota State Statue in Chapter 462.357, Subdivision 6, (2), defines "undue <br />hardship" as: <br /> <br />"... means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the <br />property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential <br />character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if <br />reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of the ordinance...." <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />B. City Requirements <br /> <br />Section VIII, D, 4, c and d, of the City's Zoning Ordinance state that, <br /> <br />"Adherence to the provisions of this ordinance is required, except for special cases which arise <br />because of the configuration of a particular parcel. The condition shall not have been created by <br />the landowner. A variance or variances of a side of a lot. the shape of the lot or the unusual <br />terrain prohibit reasonable development equivalent to that which would be permitted without <br />variance on a similar size lot located in the same districl, but which lot has no unusual <br />configuration. Economic conditions alone shall not be grounds for a variance. In no case shall <br />the granting of a variance impair the health. safety, comfort and general welfare of the public, nor <br />will it be contrary to the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan, the official map or this or <br />any other ordinance of the City". <br /> <br />Variance Findinqs <br /> <br />In order to grant a variance, the following criteria must be addressed as defined by the City <br />and the State. For this variance application, staff can make the following comments: <br /> <br />1. Whether the circumstances for which the variance is requested are unique to the . <br />properly. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.