My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-24-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 06-24-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:16 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:04:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES <br />MAY 20, 2002 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said once the property is handed over to GSA, GSA will do screening <br />with civilian agencies, then cities and townships can lay claim to the sites, <br /> <br />Council Member Larson asked iflegislation dictated the level of clean-up. <br /> <br />Mr. Connor said there was not enough money to clean-up the site to pristine levels, <br />and generally, the government will clean-up to commercial level. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said the issue the government is dealing with is the government can <br />clean-up this property and make the most advantageous plan in the shortest amount <br />oftime, and whether the it is valuable to bring a third party in on the clean-up. <br /> <br />Council Member Grant inquired if a well-articulated plan would secure the City's <br />development rights. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said yes, a well defined plan with an overlay is desirable, but keep it as <br />one parcel, with no disjointed land issues. He noted many agencies are not <br />interested in developing land that is not pristine. . <br /> <br />Council Member Larson asked if there is any residual liability. <br /> <br />Mr. Burnes said, yes, the government is always responsible for what it did, but the <br />City would be responsible for contamination subsequent to development. <br /> <br />Mr. Connors said the government ultimately responsible, and insurance can be an <br />issue, but the more the variables can be defined, cities can be insured against that. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly stated the Department of the Army is detennining that this property is no <br />longer of any need with the Next being site characterization, as early as 30 days <br />from now. He said after a staging plan is presented, a 6O-day public body screening <br />would occur. Within 120 days, the City could begin serious negotiations with the <br />government. <br /> <br />2.A Indvkiewicz Parcel Discussion <br /> <br />Broker Rob Davidson said he had been working with Arden Hills for several years, <br />noting this is a very challenging site, coming to the general conclusion that the <br />appraisal is flawed. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.