CCP 07-29-2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mcmo to Plmming Commission Planning Case #02-17 Page 3 of 4 . 1. Whether the circumstances for which the variance is requested are unique to the property. There are no circumstances that are particularly unique to the property. 2. Whether granting the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the City's Zoning Code. The variance would be keeping with the spirit and intent of the zoning code. More specifically, granting the requested variance would "promote the character of and preserve and enhance the properties and areas within the city. . . ." 3. Whether the property in question can be put to a reasonable use without granting of a variance. The garage could be replaced with a two car attached garage that was previously on the property. With our without the addition, the property can be put to use as a . single family home. 4. Whether the hardship was created by the property owner. At this point, no specific hardship can be identified. 5. Whether granting the variance will alter the essential character of the neighborhood. This will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Many homes have three car attached garages. Similar neighborhoods zoned R-2 Single and Two Family Residential are allowed a 5 foot side yard setback. Deadline for AQency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on June 25, 2002. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by August 24th, 2002 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period. The City may with the petitioners consent, extend the review period beyond 120 days. Options 1. 2. 3. Recommend approval as submitted. Recommend approval with conditions. Recommend denial with reasons for denial. If the City denies the petitioners .