Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />JULY 29, 2002 11 <br /> <br />Mark Fertig, 1413 Colleen Avenue, stated they had a fire and their garage burned <br />down and the reason they wanted to expand the garage was because it was cost <br />effective. If they had not had the fire, they would not be requesting this expansion. <br />He stated without the extra four feet, they would not be able to put three vehicles <br />in the garage. He stated none of his neighbors opposed this proposal. He stated the <br />only hardship he had was that his daughter just turned 16 and would soon need a <br />spot for her vehicle. However, he stated while they might not have a hardship, they <br />did have the need for the extra garage. <br /> <br />Council Member Larson stated that it was difficult to see that not having a three <br />car garage was a hardship. <br /> <br />Council Member Rem indicated it was important to maintain the setback the City <br />had, and while Mr. Fertig might not have enough room for a three car garage, he <br />had enough room to build a two and one-half car garage. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated he would not support this due to there not being a hardship. <br /> <br />Council Member Grant stated there were setbacks in place for a reason as <br />indicated by Council Member Rem and he was not going to support this request. <br /> <br />MOTION: Council Member Aplikowski moved for approval of Resolution No. <br />02-17, approving the side yard setback of six feet where ten feet is <br />required. The motion failed for lack of a second. <br /> <br />MOTION: Council Member Larson moved and Council Member Rem seconded <br />a motion to deny Planning Case 02-17, Fertig, Variance/setback due <br />to it not meeting the side yard setback requirements in the R -1 Zoning <br />District, no hardship is existing on the property, and the previously <br />existing two car garage could be rebuilt within the required setback as <br />set forth by the Planning Commission. The motion carried (4-1 <br />Aplikowski). <br />