Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />After the Springsted presentation, the Fiscal Planning Adviscry Committee discussed the <br />extend and timing implications of proposed referenda_ On April 4th, it was the unanimous <br />suggestion of the Fiscal Planning Advisory Committee to run a 5 year referendum for an <br />increased $222 per weighted pupil unit. <br /> <br />Recommendations: <br /> <br />The Fiscal Pianning Advisory Committee came to the conclusion that lour <br />recommendations would be made to Superintendent Thein and the Roseville School <br />Board. <br /> <br />1. The Fiscal Planning Advisory Committee recommends that the district administration <br />continue to work toward increasing effectiveness and fiscal efficiency by continuing to <br />examine creative alternatives. <br /> <br />2. The Fiscal Planning Advisory Committee recommends that the school board continue to <br />look for ways for Roseville Area Schools to provide the exempiary service that the <br />Roseville community has come to expect. <br /> <br />3_ The Fiscal Planning Advisory Committee reecmmends that Superintendent Thein <br />recommend to the Roseville School Board the running of a 5 year increased operating levy <br />that will run concurrent with the existing levy and will retire with the existing levy in 2008. <br /> <br />4. The Fiscal Planning Advisory Committee recommends that Superintendent Thein <br />reconvenes a fiscal planning task force no later than 2005 to address the retiring levies. It is <br />also a recommendation that Superintendent Thein convenes aforementioned fiscal planning <br />committee anytime changes in Minnesota Tax Law would permit an increase in Roseville's <br />levy potential. <br /> <br />5. The Fiscal Planning Advisory Committee recommends that Superintendent Thein and <br />the Roseville School Board ecnsider the current political climate when determining the <br />ecrrect course of action regarding a mail-in, Primary Election, or General Election vote. The <br />Fiscal Planning Advisory Committee was not able to reach consensus or determine a <br />specific recommendation as to which of the three options allowed for the greatest possibility <br />of passing the recommended levy. Therefor the Fiscal Pianning Advisory Committee <br />recommends that more research should be done to establish the most preferable time <br />schedule for the proposed election to increase levy authority. <br /> <br />6. The final and most important recommendation from the Fiscal Planning Advisory <br />Committee is to create a vehicle to fully educate the public as to: the financial cuts that have <br />already been made, the continuing financial needs of the district, the services that Roseville <br />schcol children and the community currently receive, the tax implications of a successful <br />levy vote, and the possible consequences of a failed levy vote. The Fiscal Planning <br />Advisory Committee recommended that "scare tactics" and "feast or famine" methodology <br />be avoided at all costs. <br />