Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Step 2. Create Job and Household Density Tables <br />Creating density tables for calculating growth potential was the sec- <br />ond task. Despite recent local and national research on density require- <br />ments for transit-supportive development, there are no universally- <br />used density tables. Draft tables were prepared using the Metropolitan <br />Council's transit-supportive guidelines. These drafts were checked <br />against conventional transportation forecasting tables, estimated den- <br />sities at existing workplaces, and development proposals with a 20- <br />year buildout period and reviewed by Coalition members. Adjustments <br />were made as seemed appropriate. <br />During the review process it was learned that job densities for re- <br />development sites are uniformly higher than those for greenfield sites <br />due to the higher cost of redevelopment. To account for this important <br />variable, a redevelopment factor was determined and applied to all <br />commercial/ industrial redevelopment parcels. These densities and the <br />redevelopment factor were inserted into a common formula used to <br />calculate future growth for each (re)development area. <br /> <br />Step 3. Calculate Job, Household, and Population Yields <br />Use the tables to calculate the growth yields for each growth scenario. <br />Note, not all mixed use centers will have the same job and household <br />yields. The range in yields is created because centers and core areas <br />vary in total acreage, are weighted to either residential or job land uses, <br />and have average densities that vary relative to transit service type. <br /> <br />Step 4. Distribute Growth by SubTAZ <br />The final step in this portion of the study was assignment of projected <br />growth to subdivided traffic assignment zones (subTAZs). This was <br />accomplished by looking at each subTAZ individually, estimating what <br />portion of it was in which development type, and projecting the num- <br />ber of jobs, households, and people in the year 2020. (Highlights of <br />both scenarios are shown on the following pages.) Data were then en- <br />tered into the model. <br /> <br />Growth Scenario Refinement for Second Model Run <br />There were two runs of the model. The second run adjusted the Coali- <br />tion growth scenario. The adjustment entailed removing the mixed-use <br />center located off County Road I on the northern edge of the Twin Cities <br />Army Ammunitions Plant (TCAAP). The City of Arden Hills recommended <br />removal based on new planning information it had received regarding <br />TCAAP. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />