Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />grassland - identifY native and oldfield <br />cropland <br />current development <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Table 4 summarizes the estimated acreage of the site with each of the following cover <br />types before and after development. Figures 10 and 11 depict existing and proposed cover <br />types, respectively. <br /> <br />TABLE 4 <br />EXISTING AND PROPOSED COVER TYPES <br />(WORST -CASE SCENARIO) <br /> <br /> Before acreage After acreage <br /> (square feet) (square feet) <br />Type 1-8 wetlands 5.9 (257,004 ft2) 5.3 (230,868 fYl . <br />W ooded/F orest 17.6 (766,656 ft2) 14.7 (640,332 fY) <br />Brush! grassland 5.0 (217,800 f2) 2.6 (113,256 ft2) <br />Cropland - 0- - 0- <br />Lawn/Landscaping ] ].4 (496,584 ft2) 24.8 (1,080,288 ft2) <br />Impervious (Buildings & pavement) 52.8 (2,299,968 fY) 45.0 (1,960,200 fY) <br />Other - Created ponding** - 0- 0.3 (13,068 fY) <br />TOTAL 92.7 (4,038,012 fe) 92.7 (4,038,012 fe) <br /> <br />Wetlands lost as a result oj the development are proposed to be mitigated on-site. However, since a <br />specific wetland mitigation plan has not yet been finalized, acreage for new (replacement) wetlands are <br />not included in this table, <br /> <br />.. <br />Not including infiltration areas. <br /> <br />B. An "overlay" map showing anticipated development in relation to the cover types; this <br />map should also depict any "protection areas," existing or proposed, that will preserve <br />sensitive cover types, Separate maps for each major development scenario should <br />generally be provided. <br /> <br />. Figure 10 in Appendix A illustrates existing cover types within the AUAR study area, <br />along with current development. <br /> <br />. Figure I I in Appendix A depicts proposed redevelopment parcels with proposed cover <br />types, <br /> <br />Guidant Campus Master Plan <br />Draft AUAR <br /> <br />-]2 - <br /> <br />September 2002 <br />