My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 10-15-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 10-15-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:28 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:06:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />indicated there was only one office more on the north side because the stairwell <br />took up a portion of this. He stated they had cut back on the decks. He noted the <br />material they chose was compatible to other buildings in various communities. He <br />stated the actual amount of usable square footage was not that much greater <br />because of the common area. He indicated they had problems with separation for <br />fire purposes. With respect to material, he stated there were many different grades <br />of material and stucco was a very attractive material if done right. With respect to <br />the decks, he anticipated they would not be used on any regular basis. He stated <br />there would be no sliding doors to the decks. With respect to screening, they <br />attempted to provide adequate screening by using spruce trees as well as a fence. <br />He noted coniferous trees would not work where suggested because that was <br />where they intended to pile the snow until it was removed. He noted coniferous <br />trees would die if snow was put along their bottom. He indicated there were <br />problems with the first building proposal with respect to structuring that building. <br />He stated this new building proposal was actually a foot lower than the previous <br />building that as approved. He stated this building would allow leasing of <br />anywhere from 1,000 to 4,000 square feet to the tenants, but the basement would <br />actually be smaller. He stated this building would be very attractive and they had <br />interest from dentists, accountants, attorneys, as well as other businesses that <br />would service the community. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mark McGuire, 2030 Glen Paul Avenue, presented a letter to the Council <br />summing up the views of all of the adjacent neighbors. He stated the following <br />neighbors were opposed to this proposal: Ruth McGuire, 2030 Glen Paul Avenue; <br />Monte and Bonnie Arhard, 2014 Glen Paul Avenue; Don and Melanie Ristow, <br />2033 County Road D; and Kim Luger, 2026 Glen Paul Avenue. He expressed <br />concern about the zoning of the area and stated they needed to take into <br />consideration what the neighbors wanted. He expressed concern about the buffer <br />yard and the accommodation for parking. He expressed concern about the <br />oversized building on this lot. He stated the building was not attractive. He <br />expressed concern about the decks intruding on the neighbors' privacy. He <br />expressed concern about the screening. He requested the City enforce the Zoning <br />Ordinances. He expressed concern about their property values. He stated the <br />neighbors would not be taken advantage of by businesses or anyone else trying to <br />exploit the neighborhood business district zoning ordinances. He stated the <br />neighbors were in support of some type of a development on that property, but <br />they wanted the City to follow the Zoning Ordinances. He stated the neighbors <br />did not want the proposed building to be oversized. He stated the adjacent homes <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.