Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />45 <br /> <br />IMPROVING FISCAL FUTURES <br /> <br />FF-l. State-Local Fiscal Relations (GC) <br /> <br />Since the 1970s, services provided by Minnesota cities have been largely funded through <br />a combination of property taxes, state aids, and state property tax relief programs. This system of <br />municipal fmance has evolved to ensure that municipal services can be funded without excessive <br />local tax burdens, <br /> <br />In 2001, the Legislature enacted significant changes to the property tax system. With <br />those changes, the state increased its funding participation for schools while city operations <br />received less funding. On average, cities are now more reliant on property taxes to fund their <br />operations, although some cities are now more reliant on state aid. The changes to the state aid <br />distribution were necessary to more evenly distribute tax relief across the state. <br /> <br />With the budget crisis that now confronts the state, further review by the Legislature and <br />possible changes to the municipal finance system appear likely. This could ultimately translate <br />into further reductions in state aid to cities and, therefore, a further increased reliance on property <br />taxes to fund city operations. <br /> <br />Any changes 10 the state-local fiscal system should meet the following goals: <br /> <br />. Reduce tax burden disparities among communities and between cities and adjacent <br />townships. <br />· Compensate cities and their taxpayers for overburden and tax exempt property. <br />· Compensate for state-imposed mandates. <br />· Provide sufficient funding to address these principles. <br />· Respect the decision-making authority of local officials. <br /> <br />FF-2. LGA Data Issues (GC) <br /> <br />Issue: The release of 2000 Census data has highlighted a problem with one of the <br />variables used in the local government aid (LGA) distribution formula. The pre-l 940 housing <br />percentage statistic used as one proxy measure of each city's need is derived from sample data <br />collected in the "long-form" survey. For individual cities, this statistic appears to significantly <br />f1ucmate and may not accurately estimate the actual age of housing. <br /> <br />Response: The Legislature should identify a replacement source for data to measure <br />the amount of housing. The formula should continue to use the 1990 Census data until a <br />more accurate replacement data set can be identified. <br /> <br />FF -3. LGA and Market-Value Homestead Credit Cuts (GC) <br /> <br />Issue: City reliance on state aids and funding for property tax relief programs means that <br />the state's budget deficit could become a local budget problem if funding for these programs is <br />1 <br />