Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />~ <br /> <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />47 <br /> <br />racial profiling. In an effort to ascertain the scope and degree of the problem, the League <br />would support objective, well fonnulated statistical sampling by third parties under the <br />auspices of a state-funded study that would develop documentation of traffic stops and an <br />analysis of those stops, coupled with an effective means of enforcing sanctions against <br />documented instances of inappropriate treatment of citizens. Additionally, the League <br />supports state funding for video cameras in police cars. <br /> <br />SD-21. 0.08 DWI (AF) <br /> <br />Issue: The state of Minnesota is considering a statutory amendment to reduce the blood <br />alcohol level from 0.10 to 0.08. Analyses anticipating the fiscal impact of the 0.08 threshold on <br />cities have been inconclusive. Under current driving while impaired (DWI) law, the arresting <br />authority is responsible for prosecution of suspected DWI offenders. A reduced threshold may <br />result in more DWI arrests by city law enforcement officers and, thus, increased prosecution <br />costs for cities. <br /> <br />Response: The League is committed to building quality cormnunities and to <br />increased public safety. By adopting and implementing the 0.08 percent BAC level <br />threshold, the state will secure existing federal highway funds that will assist in the <br />maintenance and upgrade of a safe transportation system. <br /> <br />Prior to adopting this initiative, the Legislature should carefully study the costs <br />associated with a reduced DWI threshold. The state of Minnesota should provide the <br />necessary funding to compensate local units of government for related cost increases. <br /> <br />SD-22. CriMNet (AF) <br /> <br />Issue: Public safety is compromised by the lack of centralized, complete, and accurate <br />criminal history data about individuals, incidents, and cases. And, without an integrated criminal <br />justice information system, Minnesota cannot always hold serious criminals accountable for their <br />crimes. CriMNet, Minnesota's effort to integrate the 1,100 criminal justice information systems <br />operated by agencies at all levels, will improve access to relevant criminal history data for public <br />safety and criminal justice authorities. <br /> <br />More than 500 cities operate police departments. These departments vary dramatically in <br />fiscal capacity, staffing resources, and technical expertise. Further, each municipal law <br />enforcement agency has unique operating procedures, strengths, and needs based on the <br />community it serves. The League knows CriMNet will have a significant impact on municipal <br />police business practices and could mean increased staffing needs, training, and equipment <br />purchases. The League also recognizes that every agency must participate fully in CriMNet to <br />make the system effective. <br /> <br />Response: The League supports efforts by the state of Minnesota to integrate <br />criminal justice infonnation systems. The League also supports cooperation between <br />legislators, law enforcement and corrections agents, court officials, prosecutors, cormnunity <br />groups, and businesses that build public support for CriMNet. <br /> <br />31 <br />