My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 10-28-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 10-28-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:31 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:06:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - October 15,2002 <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />Council Member Rem stated she also had a concern regarding the requirements of <br />the contract, and noted the Council had not agreed to support the requirements of <br />the contract. <br /> <br />Council Member Aplikowski asked if they needed the grant to continue the <br />process. Mr. Parrish replied they would have to amend their budget to make up the <br />difference, or utilize the City funds. He stated they had other alternatives in the <br />event they did not have it. <br /> <br />Council Member Aplikowski stated she was against the premature planning they <br />had experienced and the mandates of the contract. <br /> <br />MOTION: Council Member Grant moved and Council Member <br />Aplikowski seconded a motion to extend the Council meeting <br />until 10:30 p.m. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />Council Member Larson stated if the Metropolitan Council did not agree with the <br />planning process in the end and wanted the money back, then they would give the <br />money back, but he supported going forward with the planning process. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst indicated the Metropolitan Council was not going to go away and <br />stated they needed to work with them. He noted if they did not accept this grant, it <br />would impair the City's ability to obtain grants in the future. He urged the Council <br />to stay with their original decision. <br /> <br />MOTION: Council Member Grant moved and Council Member <br />Aplikowski seconded a motion to authorize the City <br />Administrator to return the grant money back to the <br />Metropolitan Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch noted they had not actually received any money at this point. Mr. <br />Parrish replied they had not executed the contract yet. <br /> <br />Council Member Aplikowski stated they did not need the grant money, and she <br />did not believe they should tie themselves to the Metropolitan Council more than <br />they were already required to be. <br /> <br />Council Member Grant noted the Vento Plan did not address mixed use or high <br />density and the City had agreed to follow the Vento Plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.