Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7fr- <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />~~) <br />c <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />(J <br /> <br />The task force reviewed various fonts for the lettering to be provided with the sign, <br />including Helvetica bold which is the approved City font. The task force discussed <br />the aesthetics of these different fonts, based on that the City Council would be <br />discussing this topic at its upcoming worksession. To this end, the task force <br />recommends that the City consider using Windsor font on the entry way signage. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The task force then reviewed various materials and colors for the retaining walls <br />which would support the entry way signs. The task force concluded that cut stone <br />pieces of granite, which is a waste product of the manufacturing process, would look <br />like a "dry-fit" limestone wall but with more quality for approxirnately the same <br />price. The task force concluded that the rainbow colored granite would be most <br />aesthetically pleasing. The task force also suggested that at-grade lighting be <br />provided behind the retaining walls to provide directional lighting at the sign face. <br /> <br />The task force recommends that the City pursue the mature evergreen landscaping <br />on the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP) to include behind the signs. <br />The task force also recommends the inclusion of annual planting beds with retaining <br />walls to help visually define the entry signs. Lastly, the task force recommends <br />..pursuing the assistance of Ramsey. County for surplus dirt for berming atthe <br />Lexington Avenue sign. given Ramsey County's current road. construction in the <br />area. <br /> <br />REVIEW CONCEPT DESIGN FOR MEDIAN LANDSCAPING <br />Mr. Sanders provided a concept design for the median landscaping along Highway <br />96. The concept groups the overs tory landscaping that is proposed by Ramsey <br />County for inclusion in the median. The concept would add accent ornamental trees <br />at the ends of these groups with low level shrubs beneath the ornamental trees. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The task force discussed the relative advantages and disadvantages of a high (turf) <br />and a low (native grasses) maintenance ground cover in the median. The provision <br />of a high maintenance ground cover would require underground irrigation <br />(approximately $50,000) and weekly mowing. However, the high maintenance <br />ground cover would provide for a very aesthetically pleasing median. The provision <br />of a low maintenance median would be more cost effective, but would provide for <br />an unkept look to the median. The task force recommends that the City Council <br />include the turf with underground irrigation the preferred ground cover for the <br />median. <br /> <br />FORMULATE RECOMMENDA nONS FOR CITY COUNCIL <br />CONSIDERA nON <br />The task force then summarized various findings that they had made since April of <br />1997. The task force will be presenting these findings to the City Council on <br />Monday, December 8, 1997. <br /> <br />. <br />