My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 12-09-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 12-09-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:35 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:07:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />and thrive in moist to wet fertile soil. This hedge should be a minimum of <br />six feet tall as stated in the zoning ordinances, <br /> <br />4. On street parking will create traffic problems. There is no room for it unless <br />you cut down trees that screen the business across the street. I was told by <br />Aaron Parrish that he does not recommend this. <br /> <br />5. We want the trash moved over to the other side to prevent odors to the <br />adjacent neighbors. This has caused problems in other neighborhood business <br />areas and has had to be moved. Kens Market has their trash facing county <br />road D. <br /> <br />6. Mr. Nelson has not contacted any of us for input. <br /> <br />7. Some of us feel we have not been told the whole story by Mr. Nelson. The <br />fence location. Arborvitae not being able to grow along north property lines. <br />Being told an office complex is better than a fast food restaurant or gas station <br />which is prohibited under the current zoning. <br /> <br />8. If Mr. Nelson has a problem with providing proper landscaping or snow <br />removal he should have read the city ordinances. <br /> <br />9. Mr. Nelson has clearly not met the conditions outlined by the planning <br />commission regarding proper screening. He has replaced a deciduous with <br />another deciduous tree. The leaves will fall in the winter. <br /> <br />10. When we bought this property we asked our real estate agent what could be <br />built next door. We were told very little due to the size of the lot and current <br />zoning regulations. There was a concept PUD submitted but nothing had been <br />approved. If the neighborhood business zoning was upheld Mr. Nelson would <br />only be able to build a one story building due to the parking required. There <br />would also be a thirty foot buffer yard landscaped with six foot tall evergreens <br />screening the property. Furthermore I would not be apposed to him building <br />on the lot ifhe would meet the zoning requirements. <br /> <br />II. 11 also states in Appendix A - Landscape plan that a reasonable attempt shall <br />be made to protect and preserve existing trees and incorporate them into the <br />landscape plan. Mr. Nelson has already cleared the lot. There are no plans to <br />even build until summer. I stressed my concerns to Aaron Parrish who passed <br />them on to the city council. Why were are concerns not read or listened to? <br /> <br />We are asking you to live by the city ordinances you have set up. These ordinances were <br />set up to protect us from developers like Mr. Nelson. These ordinances if followed would <br />protect our privacy, home values and undue stress. We have put a lot of time inlo trying <br />to find a solution. Please uphold the city ordinances. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.