My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 12-09-2002
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCP 12-09-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:35 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:07:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />,..."".. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, . <br /> <br />2026 Glenpaul Avenue <br />Arden Hills, MN 55112 <br />12/3/02 <br /> <br />Dear City Council Members, <br /> <br />I am writing you in regards to the development ofthe property at the comer of Cleveland <br />Avenue and County Road D. There has been a request for a two story office complex <br />with outside comer decks rather than the I Y, story office complex that was already <br />approved back in December of200 I. I want to first stress my disappointment with the <br />original plans that were approved back in December of2001. I was not against the <br />development of the property but the screening that was selected to separate this business <br />from my home. There was no screening/privacy to my property except for a trash bin and <br />a 6ft fence, which would be located on the property line. This fence would also provide <br />no screening to my property as this property line is roughly three feet lower than the <br />highest elevation of this property. Mr. Nelson originally told me that he would provide <br />the proper screening to my property and I took his word. I guess I did not define <br />"proper" with him but I can tell you that a trash bin would not be an acceptable choice. <br />That was the only time I have had a discussion with Mr. Nelson regarding the <br />landscaping of this property. <br /> <br />It was decided at the last City Council Meeting on September 30, 2002, that there needed <br />to be better screening to the adjacent residential properties. Mr. Nelson had placed a <br />folder with some changes in my front door. I am not sure when he placed this in my door <br />as I do not use this door but I found it November 17,2002. He was requesting a reply by <br />November 18th, 2002. After reviewing these suggestions, I still had some concerns. <br /> <br />1. There will be 6ft Arbor vitae planted on the property line. This will not <br />provide initial screening from the parking lot or the building. which is due to <br />the land elevation of the two properties. Eventually, it would provide <br />screening from the parking lot and the frrst story of the office building. How <br />long would this take? Why is not possible to plant these on the edge ofthe <br />parking lot instead? He has added some Arbor vitae behind the trash bin. <br />Why cant these be extended east to provide the screening from the parking lot. <br />These could also be planted to the west to provide screening from the first <br />story exit door and sidewalk Otherwise, there should be a temporary privacy <br />fence along the parking lot/side of the building until these Arbor vitae are at <br />the appropriate mature height. <br /> <br />2. There is still only a deciduous tree planted to screen from the second story <br />building. As was discussed at the last meeting, this type of tree only provides <br />screening during the snnnner when there are actual leaves on these trees. <br />With this building so close to my place of residence, this is a major concern <br />for me. We had recommended also an evergreen (pine etc) to be planted to <br />provide this screening. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.