My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
83-047
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
83-047
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:17:40 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 9:39:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. REILING: That isn't my answer, your Honor. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: Well, do you agree with your attorney <br /> <br />MR. REILING: I don't expect him to know as much about my <br />property as I know. First came the area assessment, then came <br />the front footage on Red Fox Road. We were given credit for <br />the area assessment on Red Fox Road. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN HICKS: Mr. Popovich, I didn't hear you say <br />what time period is recommended on this assessment. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: We recommended ten years at IO%. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: Any further comments from the Council? <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN MULCAHY: Can you mark the spot on your lay- <br />out there where the change takes place (inaudible). <br /> <br />MR. DAUBNEY: About that point, sir (indicating on map). <br />Assuming it developed that way (inaudible). <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN MULCAHY: What you have there with respect to <br />the proposed layout - several lots around the horseshoe - <br />that shows lots of a much smaller size than proposed lot 7. <br />Why wouldn't it be reasonable for us to assume that lot 7 <br />would develop in somewhat the same configuration as proposed <br />lot I, so that there would be four - perhaps five - <br />north/south (inaudible) lot 7 served by Red Fox Road, as to <br />which - some of which, at least - Mr. Reiling's property <br />would benefit from the service to Red Fox Road. <br /> <br />MR. DAUBNEY: Mr. Mulcahy, that's a very good question. <br />I think I have an answer for that. First of all, the portion <br />that is west of where the force main ends - that area - if <br />that was in a north/south lot - it would have no sanitary <br />sewer available to it because we can't tap into that other <br />force main. So you would have to have at least a lot that <br />was large enough to hook into the gravity main here and then <br />again have your building back here and have your construc- <br />tion - grade your property so your sanitary sewer flowed to <br />the east and then south. You couldn't develop in the area <br />fronting on the force main - and I'm sure Mr. Christoffersen <br />would agree with that, would you not Don? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: I would say that you would require <br />perhaps - although there has been some building on that end <br />recently - and I really don't know what the grades are - <br />but it could be connected by gravity extended diagonally <br />from that point - from the gravity service. If it could <br />not be, it could be treated the same way as the Nielsen lot. <br />It could be - mayor may not have a force main system in the <br />building over in that corner. <br /> <br />-9- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.