Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />CITY OF ARDEN HILLS <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />December 13, 1996 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Mayor and City Council ~ <br /> <br />Brian Fritsinger, City Administrat~ <br /> <br />1900 Edgewater Avenue, Resolution #96-71 <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />Back1:round <br />The City Council adopted Resolution #96-59 at its October 15, 1996 City Council meeting <br />addressing the abatement of 1900 Edgewater A venue. This resolution authorized the negotiated <br />purchase and/or condemnation of 1900 Edgewater Avenue. <br /> <br />Due to some technical problems in the preparation of the Purchase Agreement, the offer to <br />purchase the property was not delivered until November 26, 1996. The Purchase Agreement <br />gave the property owner until December 10, 1996 to accept the offer made by the City. <br /> <br />The property owner did not respond to the offer. However, she has been in contact with staff. <br />Shc contacted Mr. Kriesel on December 13, 1996 expressing an interest in pulling a Building <br />Permit to continue her efforts at rehabilitating the building. Staff responded that because the <br />building has been found to be dangerous and hazardous it will not issue a Building Permit at this <br />time, and that it intends to follow through with the abatement process. <br /> <br />On December 12,1996, r contacted the City Attorney to determine the status of the abatement <br />process and ifthere were any additional follow-up items the City needed to complete. Mr. Miller <br />indicated that the previous resolution, drafted and recommended by the attorney, was not <br />sufficient to complete the abatement. He recommended the City adopt an additional resolution <br />which specifically refers to Minnesota State Statute, <br /> <br />The attached resolution outlines the findings declaring the building a hazardous nuisance. The <br />adoption of this resolution provides the property owner with an additional twenty (20) days to <br />respond to the order. <br /> <br />rfthe property owner responds, the case will go to court. State Statute also requires a <br />"reasonable period" be given to abate an order. The attorney has recommended forty-five (45) <br />days to take corrective action, Mr. Miller will be scheduling a court date when this notice is <br />served to the property owner. With the holidays, he does not expect to be able to schedule a <br />court date until later next month, thus the decision to recommend a forty-five (45) day reasonable <br />period. The City will seek summary enforcement from Ramsey County at the court date to <br />expedite the process. <br />