My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-10-2003
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCP 03-10-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:18:14 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 2:34:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
223
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />II <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />,. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />Activity Three: Screening <br /> <br />Based upon the minimum qualifications and position profile, PDI <br />would screen applications to determine which individuals have the <br />highest likelihood of meeting the position requirements. Based upon <br />the job requirements and position profile, PDI would design the <br />following instruments and procedures to conduct a first screen of <br />resumes: <br /> <br />. Assessment of minimum qualifications-Resumes would be <br />checked to ensure that all minirnum qualifications are met. <br /> <br />. Resume scoring form and decision rules-Based upon the <br />position documentation, PDI would design a process whereby <br />resumes may be quantitatively evaluated and scored to yield <br />groupings of continuing candidates. <br /> <br />We would ensure that all procedures meet requirements for affirmative <br />action, EEOC, and federal and state law. <br /> <br />As part of this step, we would ensure that all candidates receive <br />information regarding the following: <br /> <br />. Procedures to alert them of their continuing status in the process <br /> <br />. Conditions regarding confidentiality <br /> <br />. Selection process timetable <br /> <br />Given the projected numbers of individuals who may apply, we would <br />recommend a follow-up screening process that would involve mailing <br />further requests for information to applicants. This will allow more <br />valid decisions regarding which individuals should achieve semi-finalist <br />status. Such requests for information may include: <br /> <br />. "Targeted" resumes--Response to specific questions regarding <br />the scope and extent of their experiences <br /> <br />. Responses to essay questions <br /> <br />. Documentation of specific accomplishments <br /> <br />Using this two-tier screening process, we would expect that the <br />screening effort would require approximately three to four weeks. <br /> <br />Activity Four: Evaluation <br /> <br />Depending upon the qualifications of candidates, we would expect to <br />present approximately six to ten candidates for further selection <br />procedures. Depending upon the wishes of the Council, we would <br />designate a set of information-gathering procedures designed to <br />produce more detailed infomlation about this smaller group of <br /> <br />Copyright ~ 2003 Personnel Decisions [ntern;nional <br />All RiShts Reserved <br /> <br />31312003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.