Laserfiche WebLink
<br />y . <br /> <br />changes are Building L, Building Addition I, Building K, and Building M. The changes also <br />contemplate a slight reconfiguration of the future main entrance to the campus. The changes do _ <br />not represent an increase in traffic or any acceleration in development phasing from the approved ,., <br />Master Plan. Specific Site Plans for Building L and Building Addition I are addressed by <br />planning cases #03-06 and #03-07 respectively. <br /> <br />Plannine Commission Recommendation <br /> <br />In Planning Case #03-05 the Planning Commission recommends approval of the Master Plan <br />PUD Amendment with the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. The applicant shall continue to abide by the conditions of approval as stated in the <br />approved Master Plan PUD. <br /> <br />Outions <br /> <br />I. Recommend approval as submitted. <br />2. Recommend approval with conditions. <br />3. Recommend denial with reasons for denial. If the City denies the petitioners request, <br />n...it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the request. n <br />4. Table for additional information. <br /> <br />Deadline for Aeencv Actions <br /> <br />The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on February 3, 2003. <br />Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the City must act on this request by April 5, 2003 (60 days), <br />unless the city provides the petitioner with written reasons for and additional 60 day review <br />period. The City may with the petitioners' consent extend the review period beyond the 120 <br />days. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Attachments <br /> <br />6Al-l <br />6AI-2 <br /> <br />Planning Commission Memo February 27,2003 <br />Planning Commission Minute Excerpt - March 5, 2003 <br /> <br />PC #03-05- CC Memo 031303 - Page 2 of 2 <br /> <br />e <br />