My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-31-2003
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCP 03-31-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:18:18 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 2:34:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
279
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Memo to Planning Commission <br />Planning Case #02-25: Preliminary Plat and MaSter Plan PUD <br />Page 9 of 12 <br /> <br />and to promote alterilative means of transpQrtation. Staff would encourage the applicant <br />toptovide tfil)re alternative 1!ransportlttidliprograms (van pooling, park and ride services, <br />altemativesllift schedules, etc.) for the applicant's employees in efforts to minimize any <br />traffic issues. <br /> <br /> <br />The applicant made note that approximately 138,500 square feet of manufacturing area in <br />Building F is leased from Guidant by a number of different companies. <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />U.,Uf__ <br /> <br />. .- .-'_,..c... . <br />The Concq,t-Plan presented to the Planning Commissidli at the January 2,2002 meeting <br />included. two 8-StOty'buildings and two 8-story parking ramps. The proposed Master <br />l>lanPUD msonly one 8-story buikliflg (building It) and has no 8-story parlcing ramps. <br />After receiving fe-edbatk on the Concept Plan: from neighborhood work sessions, Guidant <br />lias attempted to create a mote neigl1bor.fHendly design by moving the taller structures to <br />me sootli:eifi and' tirtenof portions of theca:mpus, ll11d by locating severa1Ievels. of parking <br />, tllttrp.'l1eIM,r grade. The result is that the height of these buildings would have the most <br />Visulil impact 01l the commercial property south of the campus on County RoadF. <br /> <br />Of the existing buildings 6 of the 7 are already above the maximum height criteria for the <br />1.1 Lilnite4 IildllStrialDistrict.,1n addition.. the Master Plan: shows 6 of the 8 proposed <br />, . buildings or building additipilSan4 5 of the 7 parking ramps would exceed the maximum <br />heightre</llitement. How~v~, siq~ the taller buildings and patkjng ramps ,have been <br />,pllmlIed for. the southern pottionof theca:mpus tl,ie impact of their height should be <br />mini.mized. .The tllt!les beloW con1pare,the existing,buildings, proposed buildings, and <br />proposed parking ramps, With the I-I maximum height criteria. <br /> <br /> <br />";'- <br /> <br />, .35' <br />35' <br />35' <br />35' <br />35' <br />35' <br />35' <br /> <br />57' <br />42' <br />42' <br />25' <br />45' <br />46' <br />40' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.