My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-31-2003
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCP 03-31-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:18:18 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 2:34:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
279
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e 4. <br /> <br />Memo to Planning Commission <br />Planning Case #02-25: Preliminary Plat aild Master Plan PUD <br />Page II of 12 <br /> <br />10. Environmental Review <br /> <br />Guidant is curr~t1y in the process of completing the environmental review required <br />under the Minnesota EnvironmentaJ ,Policy Act (MEPA). At their September 9, 2002 <br />meeting, the City Council adopted 3 resolution ordering the preparation of an Alternative <br />Urban Atellwide Review (AUAR) for the Guidant campus. The Council will consider a <br />draft of the AUAR at their September 30, 2002 meeting. If approved, the AUAR would <br />then be made available for public comment and distributed to various state agencies. A <br />draft AUAR is attached for your reference. No Planning Commission action is required <br />on this item. <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />Iss~es Raised at commil'liity Workgronps <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />,.,.--" <br /> <br />Several other issues were diSQlSSClll 3t the C<1I1,Ul)unity workgroup meetings and those <br />compromises have been reflected in the proposed Master Plan Planned Unit <br />Development. They include: light pollution on neighboring properties, traffic, access to <br />Cummings Patk, and the fonner Nestle property. A complete list of these issues is <br />provided in the applicant's proposed Master Plan pages 9 through II. <br /> <br />10. <br /> <br />Drainage and Utilities <br /> <br />The City lIngirteer has identified additional information that would be helpful to include <br />in the Dtainage and Utility Plans. Please see the attached comments from the City <br />Engirteer. Staff has suggested a revised Drainage and Utility Plan as a condition of <br />approval. <br /> <br />Staff,Retoiltmendation <br /> <br />In Planning Case #02-2SB staff recommends approval of the Planned Unit Development Master <br />Plan with the fol1owiilg conditions: <br /> <br />1. Approval of a PUD Permit and Development Agreement. <br />2. The phasing schedule follow the revised schedule proposed by staff. <br />3. An updated traffic study be completed at the conclusion of Phase I Development. <br />4. Approval of the Final Allemative Urban Areawide Review Mitigation Plan. <br />5. Submittal of a revised Drainage and Utility Plan as approved by the City Engineer. <br /> <br />Ontion-s <br /> <br />I. <br />2. <br />3. <br /> <br />Recommend approval as submitted. <br />Recommend approval with conditions. <br />Recommend denial with reasons for deuial. If the City denies the petitioners request, <br />. ...it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the request." <br />Table for additional information. ' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.