Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Mr. Bruce Thompson <br /> <br />- 5 - <br /> <br />March 3, 2003 <br /> <br />Table 1 <br />Existing Capacity Analysis <br />Level of Service Results <br /> <br /> ! Level of Service <br />Intersection I I P.M. Peak <br /> A.M. Peak <br />T' I I <br /> , A/D <br />CSAH 96/Snelling Avcnuc AID I <br />CSAH 96/Hamline Avenue D 1=-~ D <br /> I <br /> <br />*' Indicates an unsignalized inh::rsection. The overall LOS is shO\vn l~lllO\Yed by the worst approJch LOS. <br /> <br />Proposed Development <br /> <br />The proposed development is the relocation of the Ramsey County Public Works operation along <br />with other governmental maintcnance operations. to the northwest quadrant of CSAI-I <br />96/Hamline Avenuc, with full completion expected by year 2005 (see Figure 3: Proposed Site <br />Plan). The north approach of Hamline Avenue at CSAH 96 is currently only an access roadway <br />to the Milmesota Army National Guard Vehicle Storage facility. This roadway will also provide <br />the only access to the proposed Ramsey County Public Works Facility and a new Minnesota <br />Army 1\ational Guard Field Maintenance Shop. <br /> <br />Traffic Forecasts <br /> <br />Traffic fi)recasts were dcvclopcd !(lr year 2005. Forecast volumes for year 2005 represent onc <br />veal' after the proposed development is constructed. A two-pcrcent yearly gn)\\th rate was used <br />to account for grov\1h in background traffic volumes. This gro\\1h rate is based on rccelll <br />historical grovvth trends on roadways within the study area and is consistent with the percentage <br />used for the Guidant Traffic lmpact Study. <br /> <br />T rip generation cstimates t,x the proposed development were generated for the a.m./p.m. peak <br />homs based on employmcnt information that was provided by Ramsey County and the Army <br />National Guard. The a.m. peak hour for the Ramsey County Public Works facility occurs during <br />the peak hour of CSAH 96, however the p.m. peak hom for this facility is ITom 3: 15-4: 15, which <br />is before the p.m. peak hour on CSAII 96. ln order to represent a worst-case scenario, it was <br />assumed the all employees arrive and leave work during the peak hours for CSAH 96. In <br />addition. it was assumed that 30 percent of the Ramscy County Public Works employees and 10 <br />percent of the Army National Guard employees will leave the site in a work vehicle shortly aftcr <br />their arrival. Ten-percent of employees at each facility will return just before leaving work for <br />thc day. These additional trips were ineluded in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Trips gcnerated <br />for the proposcd Guidant facility for year 2005 were also added to the forecasted volumes. The <br />trip generation results are displayed in Table 2. <br />