CCP 04-28-2003 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e - - Mr. Bruce Thompson - 7 - March 3, 2003 Table 2 Trip Generation Estimates , ~peak P.M. Peak Land Use , Sizc i In Out In lOut , I I I I - ProDosed Development I , , I I Public Works Facility i 130 Employecs i 130 I 39 I 13 , 130 AmlY Guard Facility 1100 Employees 1_100. ! 10 10 j.. 100 I Thc directional trip distribution for thc proposed sitc-generated trips was developed based on existing travel patterns in the area. Figure 4 displays the directional distribution percentages for the proposed development. The combination of background traffic and trips generated by the proposed development is shown in Figurc 5 for year 2005, tor the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 2005 Build Traffic Operations Analysis To ddermine how ,veil the existing roadway system will accommodate the proposed development. a traftic operations analysis was conducted for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours for year 2005, The future operations analysis assumes that the programmed improvements at CSAll 96/Hamline Avcnue will be in place. These improvements ineludean additional westbound leit- tllrn lane and a southbound through [unc going away irom the intcrsectiun that ends approximately 500 feet south ofthc intersection. These base geometries arc showu in figllre 5. As shown in Table 3. one of the intersections is expected to operate at an unacceptable level or service undcr year 2005 build conditions, with existing traCJk controls and basc gcomclrics. Table 3 Year 2005 Capacity Analysis Level of Service Results Intersection Level of Senice A.M. Peak I P.M. Peak I I CSAH 96/Snelling Avenue " r- AID J AID ~C;AH 96/Hamline Avenue ~ C i E1 * Indicates an unsignalized intersection. The overall LOS is sho\vl1 followed by the \Vor5t approach LOS. 1 Level of service results are borderline DiE and can be improved with the recomm..::nded improvements.