Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />In Planning Case #03-09, staff recommends that the variance request of six (6) feet for <br />the minimum side yard setback for one side and also the variance request of six (6) feet <br />for the minimum total side yard be denied for the following reason: <br /> <br />· The State Statute definition of "undue hardship" is not met. In Chapter <br />462.357, Subdivision 6, (2), defines "undue hardship" as a situation where: <br />". ., the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls,...". However, in this particular instance the <br />official controls would allow the applicant a reasonable use; construct a <br />detached two-car garage somewhere behind the house or continue to have an <br />attached one-car garage. Also, as stated above in number 3, the property <br />could be put to a reasonable use without the granting of a variance and <br />therefore does not demonstrate that there is an undue hardship. <br /> <br />Attachments <br /> <br />L <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br /> <br />Applicant's statement. <br />Applicant's site sketch. <br />Location Map. <br />Letter from neighbors. <br /> <br />PC #03-09 - PC Report 03/27/03 - Page 6 of6 <br />