My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-30-2003
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCP 06-30-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:18:30 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 2:36:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Memo to Planning Commission <br />Planning Case #02-25: Preliminary Plat and Master Plan PUD <br />Page II of 12 <br /> <br />10. Environmental Review <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Guidant is currently in the process of completing the environmental review required <br />under the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act (MEP A). At their September 9, 2002 <br />meeting, the City Council adopted a resolution ordering the preparation of an Alternative <br />Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the Guidant campus. The Council will consider a <br />draft of the AUAR at their September 30, 2002 meeting. If approved, the AUAR would <br />then be made available for public comment and distributed to various state agencies. A <br />draft AUAR is attached for your reference. No Planiring Commission action is required <br />on this item. <br /> <br />.... <br /> <br />11. Issues Raised at Comnlnuity Workgroups <br /> <br />Several other issues Were discussed at the community workgrouptneetings and those <br />compromises have been reflected in the proposed Master Plan Planned Unit <br />Development They include: light pollution on neighboring properties, traffic, access to <br />Cutnmings Park, and the former Nestle property. A complete list of these issues is <br />provided in the applicant's proposed Master Plan pages 9 through 11. <br /> <br />10. I>taillage and Utilities <br /> <br />The City Engineer has identified additional infonnation that would be helpful to include . <br />in the Drainage and Utility Plans. Please see the attached comments from the City <br />Engineer. Staff has suggested a revised Drainage and Utility Plan as a condition of <br />approval. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation <br /> <br />In Planning Case #02-25B staff recommends approval of the Planned Unit Development Master <br />Plan with the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. Approval of a PUD Permit and Development Agreement. <br />2. The phasing schedule follow the revised schedule proposed by staff. <br />3. An updated traffic study be completed at the conclusion of Phase I Development. <br />4. Approval of the Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review Mitigation Plan. <br />5. Submittal of a revised Drainage and Utility Plan as approved by the City Engineer. <br /> <br />Outions <br /> <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br /> <br />Recommend approval as submitted. <br />Recommend approval with conditions. <br />Recommend denial with reasons for denial. If the City denies the petitioners request, <br />" . .. it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the request." <br />Table for additional information. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4. . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.