CCP 06-30-2003 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~ * "' ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - OCTOBER 2, 2002 5 . appr9priate mile&tones were in place. He stated there were other matters to be addressed such as whether or not the AUAR came in on a satisfactory basis as well as a nJmlber of things regarding the AUAR that would need to be addres.sed. He stated he was COmfortable with the PUD provided there was a Development Agreement pr!l,Sented SOm\lWne in the near future and prior to the Council meeting at the end 9fthem9!,ltb. H\l stated his greater concem was where they were he~ng with the preljminary plat. He stated the preliminary plat did not look anything like the Master Plan. He stated the preliminary plat was subject to reconstruction of Cummings Park Drive andim>tallation of t,raffic lighl$. I:J\l w;kl;l(l if Ferpwood Aven\le Was pr9p.os~ to be vll.Cat~wjth this preJimiJ,lary plat, H~$lte4 hill real COncem Was where wen: they going with the prelimiJ,1ary plat.' . Mr. Reimer replil;l(l the traffic light would be instalW1 atCll!lt11lil\gll Driveiu 2j)Q3. Mr. Franke as.ke4 alxl.\lt Lexin~9n Avenue. Mr. Brasch repljedthey bl\<1 nl,) cOJ:l,trolov\lr Lexin~9J). AVenue. Mr. P~llh replil;lj:1 the City C<>W\cil would approve the Developmeut A~t, the final AUAR, l!lld .FiMl' Plat. lJe staW<l the COll)Il)is.siQIl wO\lld .notC9Wlidt:r th~. .He stated the City wouldbilVea fOl1l\al process to vacate tbe ~eml;ltlt on. Femwoo9;'\venue andth\lIe were v:w.9\lS Slale laws that gov\lmed thi.ll. He lllat\l4 the ~lawring GQmmiS!lion would need to mak\la determination with the easement that it. wQS Cl)llsistentwith. the 'City;s(;ompr\l~~~iv~ PI,m.Withrespect to t4\lp\lve'opw.entA~~~t,iJieCity . C<>llnCil ultiw/.tely needed. t9 approve thl;It, I;u thisim>t;w.<<e, th\lg~ P@9ti~ihM ~.. thl;It they d9.not.dl,)'l)evelopment Agre.emenl$ on the ftpl,\t.en~t.H\l s.WedthepQ\lli!? comd' . s~fu\l DeveJQPlIletlt ..I\gre.ement pripr to it being appI9ve4by C,QWll:il if tJJ,IlY:w:mted. Mr. Fr@,ke stated the City shQuldnot vacate FemwoodA~enue QrapPI9ve thepiat \lntjl Gui~tlme1.V wb..e,(e.th\lY were go;>ing. He Slatl;l(lthe .Rrp.<;es.swQS~ll.C~l!fd.~e.He . indicat.l;l(l1i!1 of the iliSues ue.eded to \>e ad4rellseo. bd"prethe PIlJI. wasllflPl"OveQor F'emwQod Aveuue wl!ll vacated. He noted the enviro!1lMnlal'~dy. n.ee~ to;>\]l; cQmplele4. He sta~4e li1\li'dtJie PUD, bQt the PfQce$S WllS fr1ll;~ ;mdt9,eyii~!ldtQ SPend mOre time fo.c,using on.the details. Sharon KlJmlpp, 1278 W}'l.1crest Lane, stated the neighborhood committee tUllil;fStqgd a lQt of the .det;lils reg<!I"ding traffic. She asked if they. went forw<!I"dwith. apptl:lvals that were COi)tingent Ilppn theCo\lllcil's approval of theDevcl9Pmen~ Agr~~\,ctc. $h; state4'she WP\lld fe{ll be.tter if this W!lll approved contiJ,lgent upon a,ppmval9fthe J)evelopment Agreement and the AUAR. Mr. Parrillh replied il ba,d been thepl"llCtice Qf the City that coJ1.diti9ns were usMlIy added. In tertm1 of the DevelQprnent Agreement, that Wl!Il stan4ard pqlctice apd if the applicatioll was approved, it Was SOrnethingthat Was approved by the City CO\lllcil. He observed that one of the main iSl;qes of con!:l;lJ"Il was the proposed phasing plan. Mr. Parrish stated thaI the phasing plan would be im:lmled !Ill a condition of the pup, the Development Agre.emeut,WlQ the. AlJA,R miti.g~tiQn plWl, . RQSs Be~ch, 441.9 Amble Circle, stated he was CQnl;eqll;l(l@Qut1;he t,raffic, ~..min~upon Lexin,gton. He stated he lived in the Km1b La.lce s\lhdlvi$ion apd everyQlle Wls.t31killg about what was going on in the west and north side, butnpt on the e:mt., lJe,stJI,tOO bis location off of Karth J:.ake was locked in. He noted they only had. twp QltU,ets onto Lexington Avenue and traffic there was difficult at this time and it appe::u;e4 tobiro that