Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JUNE 4, 2003 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Chair Sand stated whatever action they took tonight they were not making with any intent <br />of impacting the lease issues or bankruptcy action. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman asked if they owned title to this property. Mr. Tucci replied <br />they had title to this property as sole owner. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson moved, seconded by Commissioner Ricke to recommend approval <br />of Planning Case No. 03-14, KTJ Limited Partnership Seventy-Nine, 3673 Lexington <br />Avenue North (Shannon Square), PUD Amendment, subject to the eight conditions as <br />listed in staff s June 4, 2003 report. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (7-0). <br /> <br />B. PLANNING CASE 03-03: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS. COUNTY ROAD E-2 AND <br />CLEVELAND AVENUE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT <br /> <br />AND <br /> <br />C. <br /> <br />PLANNING CASE NO. 03-03: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS. COUNTY ROAD E-2 <br />AND CLEVELAND AVENUE, REZONING/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br />AMENDMENT/REZONING AND COMPREHNSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT <br /> <br />Commissioner Modesette stated because she owned property in this area, she would be <br />joining the audience and excused herself from the dais. <br /> <br />Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 7:29 p.m. <br /> <br />Mr. Hellegers stated at the May 7, 2003 meeting, the Planning Commission tabled the <br />public hearing for consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for certain <br />properties generally located south of County Road E-2, west of New Brighton Road, east <br />of Cleveland Avenue and north of the Cottage Villas development in the hope the <br />Commission would hear more from the affected property owners at this meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Hellegers indicated the Commission had three options: <br /> <br />. Rezoning; <br />. Comprehensive Plan Amendment; or <br />· Combination of Rezoning and a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. <br /> <br />Chair Sand invited anyone for or against the Planning Case No. 03-03 to come forward <br />and make comment. <br /> <br />Chair Sand noted they had received an e-mail from the owner of Lot 9, Jim Spaniol, <br />noting he was in favor of the area being a neighborhood business. <br /> <br />Mr. Hellegers stated he had spoken with Katie Connolly, Lot 7, who indicated she <br />wanted the area to be neighborhood business. He had also left a message for <br />representatives of Cottage village, but had not received a response back. He indicated <br />