Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - AUGUST 6, 2003 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />3. The sign adjustment will not result in a sign that is inconsistent with the pmpose of <br />the zoning district in which the property is located. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson asked if the All American Engineering property was a conforming <br />use. Mr. Hellegers replied it was grand fathered in and it was allowed as a current use. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson expressed concern about the looks of the outdoor storage at the All <br />American Engineering site. <br /> <br />Chair Sand asked if it was proper that the non-owner of a piece of property apply for a <br />sign variance. Mr. Hellegers replied this situation had occurred in the past, and it was <br />acceptable. <br /> <br />Chair Sand stated he did not have any problems with the fusty-Print sign, but he had a <br />concern about grandfathering in the All American Engineering sign. He s,ated he would <br />not have this concern if each property submitted its own request, but one property owner <br />should not apply for both property owners. Mr. Hellegers noted there would be one sign <br />that would serve both businesses, and the proposed sign would be more attractive than <br />the existing sign. He indicated the older signs presently on the property would be <br />removed. He stated if there were issues with the All American Engineering storage, the <br />City had other ways of dealing with this type of a concern. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson noted maintenance was lacking in this area and it needed to be . <br />addressed. Chair Sand requested staff inform Ramsey County about the condition of the <br />easement. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman slated he believed that separate applications should have been <br />submitted. <br /> <br />Mr. Hellegers stated he would look at the zoning for AIl American Engineering and <br />check to see what the Ordinance said at that time and if they were not in compliance, he <br />would turn this over to the Code Compliance Officer. <br /> <br />Chair Sand asked if they could put a condition on this that AIl American Engineering had <br />to clean up their property before the sign could be put in. Mr. Hellegers replied they <br />could do it, but it could present problems. <br /> <br />Commissioner Modesette expressed concern about the height of the sign and asked if it <br />would block Carroll's Furniture sign. Mr. Hellegers stated he believed it would not block <br />the Carroll's Furniture sign, and the owner of Carroll's had indicated he had no problem <br />with this variance as long as it did not block his sign. <br /> <br />Chair Sand invited anyone for or against the variance to come forward and make <br />comment. <br /> <br />Dale Beane, owner of fusty-Prints, stated his proposed sign would not block the Carroll's . <br />Furniture sign. He noted All American Engineering was not paying for any of this sign, <br />but AIl American Engineering had agreed that he could remove their existing sign and <br />put up a new sign. He stated he was not getting any compensation from All American <br />Engineering for this sign. <br />