My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-29-2003
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCP 09-29-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2008 2:15:37 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 2:37:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br /> <br />. ARDEN HILLS REGULQ CITY COUNCIL MEETING ~ES <br />NOYEMBER 12,2002 <br /> <br />.., l. <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst replied if the comments came in the next day or two, they would nut <br />be rejected. Mr. Parrish noted if the C'Ouncil wanted to extend the'c30day , <br />deadline, they could do so. <br /> <br />Mr.. Itebaer replied they would accept c'Omments concerning the AUAR through <br />Friday, November 15, 2002. <br /> <br />~r..Sc*les stated he lived in the neighborh'Ood for 'Over 30 years and he had a <br />concern regarding the traf'fi.c. 'Ple stated; lteI)elievethe ni1itlbets <lD.' the tritffic <br />,study were understated. He expressed concern about the traffic 'On Hamline <br />A.ute 'aW'~emed that access to Hamline 'Avenue Was alreadY' dif'I:iCiW.f at <br />tli:W'nffie, 'H'C;mdi~GuidmH; was:a goodheighbor,andshoukl be erititlei'tt}'rlo <br />what they Wahtetl;l1ut Gtiidant's\property was bounded to the west arid north by <br />,sUtgrt:fii:fniIy;b:i.Mres'an'dth~n:ef~bors ,had some rightsa1so:He fioteddutdmt <br />had ddnea good job with the Master Plan, but he believed tlmte were'dlli:er <br />, "alternatives that had ,not been ,explored_ ,He believed the ,City C'Ouncil"and the <br />Pl~t~1_Stti9n IhetnbetsshdUld have attended the neighborhoo(fi\~ings. . <br />'Rlfn~mliili:e_>fu tltew~ loohub1l1ittedapetlti6hregaratng a traffic signal <br />artd'etfttm;nmt!lto the' Coitncil,buHhey had not receiwd a respdrtse. <br /> <br />'Mrs..,l.ol'V Franke. J228. \Vvnrid~e Drive. thanked Guidant f'Orworking\with the <br />neighbors. She noted Guidant was veryapptoacl1able if peOple hM anyq\1eS'tions. <br />She noted there were still problems, including traffic, but Guidant was taking this <br />stelHiy"sttp:' " " , , <br /> <br />t~KteQn. asked if the City could update the Codes t'O include bicycle paths and <br />trailS' 'f{Nm.~1ml~e' '~e to 'tide their bikes t'O wotk. He requested bicycle tacks <br />algd be~dedto the GtiidantC8:tnpus. <br /> <br />I; <br /> <br />l\f()TlON::Council . Member Grant mdVed an:d COUficit Member <br />Aplik'Owski ,seconded a motion to appr'Ove :Planning Case No. <br />02-25: Guidant Preliminary Plat and final PUD 'With <br />conditi'Ons as outlined in the staff's November 6, 2002 report, <br />revising recommendation number three, to read,!'An updated <br />traffic study and parking capacity review be completed at the <br />conclusion 'Of Phase I development". . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.