My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-29-2003
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
CCP 09-29-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2008 2:15:37 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 2:37:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />() <br />Memo to Planning Commission <br />Planning Case 002-25: Preliminary Plat andMasterPlanPUD <br />Page II of12 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />~ .., l" . <br />i <br /> <br />10. Environmental Review <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ll. <br /> <br />Guidantis currently in the Process, PfCompl~gthe envVonmentl\l review required <br />under the t.iiunesota EnvironmenWl Policy Act WIlPA).At~~ $q>tember 9, 2002 <br />m~ing, the City COuncil adopted iuesolutiQn ord\Xitig the prllp~on,of311 Mternative <br />Orban MeilwideJ{eview (AUAR) for the Gmdant campllS. TheCollncil will considet'a: <br />draft of the AUAR at their September 30, 2002 meeting. If approved, the AUAR would <br />then be made available for public comment and distributed to various state agen<:'~14 <br />draft AUAR is attached for your reference. No Planning Commission action is reqliIted <br />on this item. <br /> <br />",,!,..,~,.;:, <br /> <br />.;,... <br /> <br />,f,;y-~~~-:: ,"" ';:"': '-,:~,_.-.< ::'''',__ '_ ,,':!o, ,'_," _ ,-J- ,:" "". ':, ,..",',- <br />ls'Sues,Raimt at ~m'ltiili1ity Workgroups <br /> <br />Several other issues we~ 'dis<mss~ ~ili~Comfuuffiiy:wp~~~~qa~~ <br />compromises have been reflect;' fit th~ proP6secfMaSter' PlanPlaDned 'UDit <br />Development. They include: light pollution on neighboring properties, traffic, access to <br />Cummings Park, and the former Nestle property. A complete list of these issues is <br />pl'Ovided in the applicant's proposed Master Plan pages 9 through II. <br /> <br />'.-.:".~.. ,. <br /> <br />10. Dh'iBage an'd Utilities <br /> <br />TheCityEngirteer has identified additional information that would be helpful to include e <br />in the Drainage and' Utility Plans. Please see the attached comments from the City <br />Engirteer. Staff has suggested a revised Drainage and Utility Plan as a condition of <br />approval. <br /> <br />Statt R~ommendalioll <br /> <br />In Planning Case oo2-25'B staff recommends approval of the Planned Unit Development Master <br />Plan with the following conditions: <br /> <br />QptiollS <br /> <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />1. Approval ora POD Permit and Development Agreement. <br />2. The phasing schedule follow the revised schedule proposed by staff. <br />3. An updated traffic study be completed at the conclusion of Phase I Development. <br />4. Approval of the Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review Mitigation Plan. <br />5. Submittal of a revised Drainage and Utility Plan as approved by the City Engineer. <br /> <br />Recommend approval as submitted.. <br />Recommend approval with conditions. <br />Recommeud denial with reasons for denial. If the City denies the petitioners request, <br />.. .. . it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the request. .. <br />Table for additional information. <br /> <br />e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.