Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />SEPTEMBER 29,2003 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />B. Onlinanee 345: RezoniBf Certain Properties from an R 2 Zone to a NB <br />Zone Seeond Readinf <br /> <br />C. Plannin!!: Case No. 03-22: Noltin!!: Variance <br /> <br />Mr. Hellegers stated applicants were requesting a variance of 36.96 feet from the <br />front yard setback, a variance of 5 feet from the current side yard setback for <br />accessory buildings, and a variance to Section 6, A, 3 which states that no <br />accessory structure shall be nearer the front lot line than what was the required <br />front setback. He indicated the variance would allow the applicant to construct a <br />new two-car garage in approximately the same location as the existing two-car <br />garage. He noted the Planning Commission had recommended approval of the <br />variance with conditions. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked if this proposal was for a larger two-car garage. <br />Mr. Hellegers noted this was correct. He indicated the neighbors in the area had <br />supported this proposal. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Rem moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a <br />motion to Planning Case No. 03-22, Earl and Judith Nolting, 336 <br />Lake Johanna Boulevard Variance (Zoning Ordinance) with <br />conditions as noted in staffs September 29,2003 report. The motion <br />carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />D. Plannin!!: Case No. 03-23: Guidant Site Plan Review Parkin!!: Ramp #1 <br /> <br />Mr. Hellegers eXplained applicant was requesting approval of a Site Plan Review <br />for Parking Ramp #1. He indicated the Planning Commission had recommended <br />approval of this site plan with conditions as noted in staffs September 29, 2003 <br />report. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden expressed concern about both visual and noise <br />buffering. Mr. Hellegers replied the grow wall would not buffer noise, but would <br />be visually appealing. He noted trees would buffer the noise. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated he was not impressed with the grow wall concept . <br />because of Minnesota's limited growing season. He stated he believed the grow <br />wall could be a secondary screening method used. He indicated he wanted a <br />