CCP 12-08-2003 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . . We believe the new building was positioned on the property where the owners would not have to view it but where two other neighbors would need to see it from their regular living spaces. During the meeting, the Bemishs were unable to articulate why they would not build in thc south area of their lot where no one but the owners would see the building. We believe it is because they would have to look at the building from their own living space. The current situation is inconsistent with Arden Hills' ordinance intent, desire for privacy, and statement in the building ordinance "for the benefit of all." The owner did not request a building permit until Reed Byers alerted the city. The building was in the course of construction at that point inconsistent with getting prior approval as mentioned in the ordinance. The pennit given to Bemish by the city is also not consistent with overarching principles outlined in the building ordinances. The structure does not meet with ordinance requirements to match the main structure in appearance. Owner indicated they spent $100,000 on improvements then how prohibitively expensive the siding would be at $2,000. Also curious is the value of the four-wheelers and motorcycles in the new garage. . . . . Action Plan: . The City of Arden Hills will reassess if the location and construction materials of the building satisfy other conditions of the ordinance than simply setback. The City of Arden Hills will research the valuation decrease as a result of the new structure. The City of Arden Hills asked all parties get together to discuss a solution. We will not do that. History as shown the structure owners are unyielding, aggressive, and insensitive to others needs. We have decided to co-exist. While unfortunate, no communication has proven to be the best route. It is time for the City to take action to remedy this situation. City to determine if a valid survey was completed for the project consistent with Arden Hills ordinance requirements. Arden Hills will contact Michelle Owen and Reed Byers with their findings. . . . . We realize this unfortunate situation is not ea...ily resolved. however we believe a decision must he made and liabilities determined so damaged parties can be made whole andlor the situation can be corrected by removal or relocation of the structure. We offer these final questions to make our point: Can people negatively impact others' financial positions simply because they own too many things? How would you, the reader, feel ifthis building was erected so close to your valuable property? We have enjoyed living in Arden Hills. We ask you act according to what you know is right. f/;t~ . ~;J!~ Reed Byers 1416 Arden Oaks Ct Arden Hills, MN 55 112 Michelle Owen 1428 Arden Oaks Ct Arden Hills, MN 55112