Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(e <br /> <br />f~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />DESIRED OUTCOMES: <br />1. Citizens will have a voice in creating their future community <br />2. Cities will be able to provide guidance to potential investors in their communities <br />3. Developers will have a consistent and complete understanding of expectations. <br />4. City costs will be lower and processing easier. <br />5. Revisions and updates of Comprehensive Plans will be more efficient. <br /> <br />PROJECT TASKS: <br /> <br />PROJECT TASKIPHASEI TARGET DATE <br />Work Plan Pronosal 6/15/2002 <br />Suooort Services in place 7/01/2002 <br />Comolete reviews of City Plans & Codes 8/30/2002 <br />Review outcomes with City Staff & P1anning Commissions 11101/2002 <br />Complete all City processes 7/01/2003 <br /> <br />SHORT TERM ACTIONS NEEDED: <br /> <br />ACTIONI ISSUE ASSIGNED PERSON <br />Determine Suoport Service Needs EricsonlBenke/Swenson <br />Work Plan Prooosal for CDC & Board Aooroval EricsonlBenke/Swenson <br /> <br />PROJECT CHAMPION: <br /> <br />PHONE NUMBER: <br /> <br />EMAIL ADDRESS: <br /> <br />FAX NUMBER: <br /> <br />May 9, 2002 <br /> <br />C :\My Documents\!- 35W\ActionPlans02lCoalitionProjectDescriptionslCITY PLANNING ,doc <br /> <br />2 <br />