My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 01-12-2004
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CCP 01-12-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:19:18 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 3:33:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN H1LLS REGULAR C1TY COUNC1L MEETING MINUTES <br />DECEMBER 8,2003 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br />A. I-35W Corridor Coalition: 2004 Membership <br /> <br />Mr. Parrish stated the 2004 dues for participating in the l-35W Corridor Coalition were <br />$11,594. In addition, based on Council's request, staff contacted a local G1S consultant to see <br />what the cost would be to obtain equivalent G1S services from a private vendor. He noted <br />equivalent services would cost approximately $3,000 annually. He asked Council if they wished <br />to participate in the l-35W Corridor Coalition in 2004. <br /> <br />Council member Holden cxpressed concern about how the City's voice was bcing heard and she <br />was not sure this was a good represcntation for Arden Hills. <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Holden <br />seconded a motion to withdraw funding and membership in the 1- <br />35W Corridor Coalition and cease the City's participation in that <br />organization. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant also expressed concern about how the City's voice was being heard <br />within this organization. He noted, however, it was not his intent to say that this coalition was . <br />not valuable or did not have something to offer. He statcd he believed staff's time should be <br />focused on TCAAP, and the coalition had become much larger and much more diversified in the <br />things it looked at than any of the members envisioned when it started out. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski spoke against the motion. She stated she had concerns about how the City <br />was perceived, but the coalition members did come to bat for the City on the Postal Service, <br />which was recognized by the St. Paul Chamber. She noted many residents had also accessed the <br />Housing Resource Center. She stated they should not base their vote on the rcccnt New Brighton <br />joint meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated he was ambivalent about this motion. He agreed with <br />Councilmembers Grant and Holden in trying to gauge the value of the services they purchased, <br />not only the time, but also the cost of the membership. On the other hand, he believed there were <br />some valuable services they rcceived. He stated he did not know what the vision of the coalition <br />was or what their goals were. He stated hc did not want to see this coalition become another <br />level of government. He stated he would feel more comfortable voting on this if he could see <br />how the City benefited from this membership and what the vision and goals of the coalition were. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated she also agreed with Councilmember Larson regarding what the <br />goals were of the coalition and if Arden Hills was getting their money's worth out of this <br />membership. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.