My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 02-09-2004
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CCP 02-09-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:19:22 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 3:33:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />JANUARY 26, 2004 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Ms. Michalak stated the right of way was very important to her. She asked ifthere would be any <br />need to take any of her property. Mr. Brown stated her property should be okay, but there were <br />properties where the road was not correctly aligned and in those cases, they would work with the <br />City Attorney to obtain the appropriate right-of-ways. <br /> <br />Steve Petry, 1146 Edgewater, asked about the watershed area and if anything had to be done or <br />if it could be left as it was. Mr. Brown replied that as it currently was, the watershed did not <br />store the appropriate amount of water and the City wanted to improve its capacity. <br /> <br />Mr. Petry stated he was on a comer lot and when he looked at the City's assessment policy, it <br />appeared he would be assessed for 134 feet of frontage. He asked if this assessment policy <br />applied to him considering he lived on a comer lot. Mayor Aplikowski replied it did apply to <br />him. <br /> <br />Mr. Moore noted he had the right to appeal any decision and staff would look at each appeal <br />individually, but the current assessment policy would be applied. <br /> <br />Mr. Petry asked if the assessments were spread out over 20 years. Mr. Parrish replied the last <br />assessment the City did was for 10 years with interest.. <br /> <br />Gordy Dean, 3233 Shoreline Lane, stated the proposed construction did not go all of the way to . <br />the park and asked if he would be assessed all of the way to the park. Mr. Moore replied this <br />would be a special case and he would have the right to bring it to Council, but they would start <br />by assessing full frontage because he was benefiting by the access to the park. <br /> <br />Mr. Dean stated he had worked with Mr. Landwer and he was very good to work with. <br /> <br />Dave Munson, 1175 Edgewater, stated it appeared he would lose four feet of his driveway, <br />which would make the driveway unusable for parking. He also noted the garage on the north end <br />did not exist and the homes were set back farther than indicated. He asked the Council to look at <br />the parking issues in driveways such as his. Mr. Brown stated this was an instance where the <br />road was not properly lined up with the right-of-way and they would be working with the <br />residents regarding this. He stated they hoped to keep the road where it was, but they would need <br />to talk to those residents. He stated their intent was to keep things as they were today. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski asked if the Council would see a revised plan on this as these issues were <br />worked out. Mr. Moore replied Council would see a revised plan. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski closed the public hearing at 8:00 p.m. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked why the City was utilizing Lake Lane for City access to Ingerson <br />Park. Mr. Moore replied the only way staff could maintain the lower level of the park was to . <br />come in through the back way since it was impossible to get back up to the upper level with the <br />equipment due to the steep terrain. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.