My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-29-2004
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CCP 03-29-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:19:28 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 3:34:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />f, <br /> <br />~ <br />~HILLS <br /> <br />Agenda Item #: <br />Council Meeting Date: <br />Prepared By: <br />Originating Department: <br /> <br />Bndgeted Amount: <br />Actual Amount: <br />Final Action Needed By: <br /> <br />6C <br />March 29. 2004 <br /> <br />~~ @ <br /> <br />$0.00 <br />$0.00 <br />April! O. 2004 <br /> <br />Request of City Council Action <br /> <br />Council Action Request: <br /> <br />Consider approval of an amendment to the Special Use Permit (SUP) Master Plan; a site plan <br />review; and maximum height variances ofSfeetfor the overall mass of the building height, 11.5 <br />feet for the elevator penthouse, and 17 feet for the architectural feature to allow construction of <br />a new 4-story dormitory on the northeast portion of the Bethel College campus. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation: <br /> <br />Approve the amendment to the Special Use Permit Master Plan and site plan subject to the <br />eleven conditions of approval as listed on staff's report to the City Council dated March 29, <br />2004. <br /> <br />Also, approve height variances of S feet for the overall mass of the building height, 11_ 5 feet for <br />the elevator penthouse, and 17 feet for the architectural feature after making the following <br />findings: <br /> <br />1. The circumstances for which the variances are requested are unique to the property. <br />2. Granting of the variances would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the City's Zoning <br />Ordinance. <br />3. The property in question could not be put to a reasonable use without the granting of a <br />variance. <br />4. The hardship was not created by the property owner. <br />5. Granting the variance will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Advisory Commission Action: <br /> <br />[8] Planning <br />D PTRC <br /> <br />[2JApproved <br />DApproved <br /> <br />DDenied <br />DDenied <br /> <br />March 3. 2004 <br /> <br />Action: DReviewed <br />Action: DReviewed <br /> <br />Date <br />Date <br /> <br />Supporting Documents: <br /> <br />[8] Memo/Letter: <br />Staff Report to Council - March 29, 2004 <br />Staff Report to Planning Commission - March 3, 2004 <br />D Resolution (No. ) <br />D Ordinance (No. ) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.