CCP 05-24-2004 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION -MAY 5, 2004 2 Mr. Hellegers stated applicants were requesting a Sign Standard Adjustment from Ihe Signage Ordinance criteria for a wall sign. He noted the property was located in the 1- Flex Zoning District and was bordered by commercial property on all sides; the north side borders Interslale 694. The proposed sign would be located on the northwest comer of the building, facing Interstate 694. Due to the property's location off Red Fox Road and I-Flex zoning, the property is considered to be in Sign Dislricl 7; I-Flex, Gateway and Non-Frontage Commercial. The proposed signage would include a 90 square-foot for an unlit wall sign, which reads "GE Security" in while aluminum channel letters set against lhe brick of the building. In addition there would be a white alwninwn "GE" logo emblem. If the property did have frontage on one of the major roads in the Cily, it would be permitled 10 have wall signage of approximately 80 square feet with external, internal, or backlit lighting. The applicant has indicaled that since il is located approximately 900 feel south of Interstate 694, that the signage would be necessary to be reasonably visible. Furthermore, several other properties along 694 between Highway 51 and Lexington Avenue have backlit wall signs, which are larger Ihan the current Sign Ordinance requirements. Duc to the location of the property, abutting Interstate 964, but approximately 900 feet to the soulh and approximately 1700 feet west of Lexington Avenue, staff made the following findings: 1. There are site conditions which require a sign adjustment to allow the sign to be reasonably visible from a street immedialely adjacent to the site. 2. The sign adjustment will not result in a sign that is inconsistent with Ihe purpose of the zoning district in which the property is localed. Staff recommended approval based on the following conditions: 1. Should the sign require building work, the applicant shall file the necessary building permits with the City Building Official for approval prior to Ihe issuance of a building permit. Chair Sand invited anyone for or against the variance to come forward and make comment. Steve Craig, applicant, stated the application as presented was accurate and asked if Ihe Commission had any questions. There were no questions from the Commission. Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 7 :07 p.m. Commissioner Zimmerman moved, seconded by Commissioner Larson to recommend approval of Planning Case No. 04-09, GE Securily/Interlogix, 1275 Red Fox Road, requesl for a Sign Standard Adjuslment subjecllo the condition as outlined in staffs May 5, 2004 report. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). B. PLANNING CASE NO. 04-10: BETHEL COLLEGE; SPECIAL USE PERMIT MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT; 3900 BETHEL DRIVE Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 7:08 p.m.