Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />April I, 2004 <br />Page Two <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements aTe free of material <br />misstatement, we perfonned tests of compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. However, the <br />objective of our tests was not to provide an opinion on compliance with such provisions. We noted no instances of non- <br />compliance \....ith Minnesota slatules. <br /> <br />Significant Accounting Policies <br /> <br />Management has the responsibility for selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. In accordance with the terms of our <br />engagement leHer, \>"C will advise management about the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. The <br />significant accounting policies used by the City are described in Note 1 to the general purpose financial statements. No new <br />accounting policies were adopted and the application of existing policies was not changed during 2003. \Ve noted no <br />transactions entered into by the City during the year that were both significant and unusual, and of which, under professional <br />standards, we are required to inform you, or transactions for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus, <br /> <br />Accounting Estimates <br /> <br />Accounting estimates arc an integral part of the combined financial statements prepared by management and are based on <br />management's knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting <br />estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the general purpose financial statements and because of the <br />possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected. The mosl significant estimate affecting . <br />the financial statements was depreciation on fixed assets. <br /> <br />Management '5 estimate of deprc<.:jation is based on estimated uscfullives of the assets. We evaluated the key factors and <br />assumptions used to develop this estimate in determining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a <br />whole. <br /> <br />Audit Adjustments <br /> <br />For purposes oftbis letter, professional standards define an audit adjustment as a proposed correction of the combined financial <br />statements that, in our judgment, may nol have been detected except through our auditing procedures. An audit adjustment may <br />or may not indicate matters that could have a significant elIect on the City's financial reporting process (that is, cause future <br />financial statements 10 be materially misstated). In our judgment, none of the adjustments we proposed, whether recorded or <br />unrecorded by the City, cithcr individually or in the aggregate, indicate mattcrs that could have a significant effect on the City's <br />financial reporting process. We did propose 24 journal entries that are considered year end accounting entries that a City should <br />make in order to have accurate records before an audit begins.. We encourage the City to reduce the accounting entries necessary <br />to adjust year end balances. Wc noted no uncorrected misstatements. <br /> <br />Disagreements with Management <br /> <br />For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a matter, whether or not resolved to <br />our satisfaction, concerning a financial accounting, reporting or auditing matter that could be significant to the general purpose <br />financial statemenls or the auditor's report. \Ve are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course ofuur <br />audit. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />%2.8:~;;.90I)O . Full. 9,')1.8.1:,d161 <br /> <br />I\'ww.<olem<:>pds.("<.>Jll <br />