My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 10-12-2004
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CCP 10-12-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:19:46 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 3:36:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION <br />September 20, 2004 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Council Member Holden was wondering if the City currently maintains the sidewalks? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Tom Moore, Operations and Maintenance Director, noted that the City does maintain the <br />sidewalks year around. The City's snow removal equipment is for sidewalks that are five feet <br />and wider. <br /> <br />Council Member Grant would like to see a cost comparison of the proposed sidewalk if it was <br />placed on the south side of County Road E. He also believes that this project should be delayed. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski was wondering if the sidewalk is a safety concern. Should the neighbors be <br />asked to provide more input on this project. The neighborhood needs to buy into this project. <br /> <br />Council Member Larson mentioned that the proposal is part of the City's master plan. The south <br />side of the street is not economically feasible due to the grading and utility lines located in this <br />area. The proposed trail would run along Snelling Avenue and connect to two of the City's <br />parks. People are currently walking in the street. Installing sidewalks in this area would benefit <br />the City of Arden Hills as a whole. It is the City Council's job to make difficult decisions. <br /> <br />Council Member Holden stated that the residents she has spoken to feel that the sidewalk is a <br />waste of tax dollars. <br /> <br />Council Member Larson noted the PTRC (Parks, Trails, Recreation Commission) would not . <br />have recommended this proposal without the new sidewalk. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski stated that the bridge and sidewalk are not a package deal. The bridge was <br />approved by the PTRC before the sidewalk. <br /> <br />Engineer Brown mentioned that state funding is available for the bridge and sidewalk <br />installation. The Council could request that eighty percent of the costs be covered by cooperative <br />agreement dollars. The project scope must be finalized as a bridge or bridge and sidewalk <br />project before the City can seek funding from the State of Minnesota. <br /> <br />Mayor Aplikowski stated that there was a consensus and both items will be brought to a future <br />Council meeting for action. The affected neighborhood will be notified of this Council meeting. <br /> <br />Replacement Vehicles <br />Council Member Holden requested that she be able to view a piece of equipment that is <br />scheduled for replacement. She wants to ensure that the City is not replacing equipment on the <br />basis of age alone. Maintenance costs should be the primary reason why a piece of equipment is <br />replaced. <br /> <br />City Administrator Wolfe noted that a piece of equipment will not be replaced solely on the basis <br />of age. <br /> <br />City staff is in the process of creating a more accurate system for monitoring vehicle records. . <br />This will be a valuable tool in tracking vehicle expenditures in the future. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.