My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 10-12-2004
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CCP 10-12-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:19:46 PM
Creation date
11/14/2006 3:36:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />County Road E Trail Improvements <br />October 6, 2004 <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />Option 2 project costs are eligible for cooperative agreement funding. <br /> <br />2. Some of the estimated costs of the bridge options above are higher than those listed in the <br />feasibility report in order to account for recent significant increases in the cost of steel. <br /> <br />3. Option C estimate includes interior safety rail between sidewalk and roadway (not in <br />original feasibility estimate). <br /> <br />4. An eight-foot wide walk is included in Bridge Option 2 vs. six-foot walk in Bridge <br />Option 1 for comparison. <br /> <br />Sidewalk Option 1: <br />. 6 Foot Concrete Sidewalk <br />. 2 Foot Edge Strip <br />Total Project Cost <br /> <br />$ 54,700 <br />$ 25,000 <br />$ 79,700 <br /> <br />OR <br /> <br />Sidewalk Option 2: <br />. 6 Foot Concrete Sidewalk <br />Total Project Cost <br /> <br />$ 54,700 <br />$ 54,700 <br /> <br />Sidewalk Option Note: <br /> <br />1. Preliminary discussion with MnDOT indicate that the sidewalk portion of the project <br />would not score high for cooperative agreement funding however, state aid funds could <br />be used for these improvements. <br /> <br />Recommend Council Action <br />Staff requests that Council provide direction on project scope and take appropriate action on the <br />attached Resolution 04-56, <br /> <br />In terms ofthe bridge, staff believes that this is a significant safety concern and major "choke <br />point" for the City. The bridge improvement is recommended. <br /> <br />Staff supports the concept of the sidewalk as a connection to an overall City trail system as <br />outlined in the Parks and Trails Master Plan. However, recognizing the intrusiveness into <br />existing residential yards, staff would recommend the least intrusive, yet viable option available. <br />Most likely this would be the option with a 2-foot set-back (colored pavement or brick) with a 6- <br />foot sidewalk. Trail linkages and pedestrian safety are the primary reasons for supporting the <br />sidewalk concept. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.